AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Jacqueline Smith

CULAR145B · CUL145B · CULINARYARTS · JAQUISUX · CUL145A · CULIN2485 · CULIN145B · CULARTS · FOOD145A · CUL145 · FOODSERVICES · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Skip if you want real kitchen training; only consider if you already like her vibe and do not need serious chef prep.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing ChefLow Skill TransferClassroom DramaCaring to SomeCafeteria Prep Focus
  • Reviews swing from best teacher ever to waste of time with almost no culinary skill teaching.
  • Many later comments say class is free cafeteria labor, canned food, and personal stories.
  • Difficulty is often low, but learning value and professionalism are frequent deal-breakers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Difficulty ratings are low and many complaints are about .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students often describe light culinary content, canned prep, and little technical challenge.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

, but comments focus more on class quality than strict policy.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Negative reviews outnumber glowing ones and warn of wasted time, money, and no chef skills.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some say grades depend on whether she likes you; others report decent grades for doing the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Many describe sitting around, chatting, or simple cafeteria tasks rather than heavy study load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Early praise for patience clashes with frequent claims of no demos, no skills, and unprofessional behavior.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Practical kitchen tasks and class participation dominate; formal exams are barely discussed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and and face drama or busywork.

Main concern

Weak skill teaching and unprofessional classroom climate dominate negative experiences.

What students said

“Dosen't teach anything. Sit in the class for more than half of the semester.”
CUL145A
“You dont learn even the basic of skills, which is sad on its own.”
CUL145B
“AWESOME TEACHER!! THE .”
CULINARYARTS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews center on lab work and class conduct rather than proctored exams.

Lab Practical FocusLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policies; assessment is lab and participation oriented.

Kitchen LabsParticipation-Based
“this is food prep for the cafeteria; far from an educational cooking experience.”
CUL145
“then go in kitchen,become free labor for the cafeteria.”
CULIN145B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“What i thought would be a good experience turned out to be a waste of efforts. It wont matter if you try, in the end you achieve nothing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person culinary reviews, balancing early praise with later skill and climate complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Dosen't teach anything. Sit in the class for more than half of the semester.”

👨‍🍳 Skill Building

30/100

“You dont learn even the basic of skills, which is sad on its own.”

❤️ Supportive Side

80/100

“AWESOME TEACHER!! THE . VERY PATIENT, HELPFUL, EASY TO GET ALONG WITH.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She rarely demos for her students
  • , she just reads the book to you
  • one of the

Theme 2

🍳 About Kitchen Experience

  • become free labor for the cafeteria
  • using canned food and pretending it's fresh
  • i did not go to school to doctor up canned chili!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Very nosey with personal problems
  • Teacher talks bad about someone @ least once a day
  • Will ask personal questions from the students in from of the entire class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen in-person reviews show a clear positive-to-negative shift over years with detailed classroom complaints.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CUL145A3 reviews
CUL1452 reviews
CULIN145B2 reviews
CUL145B1 review
CULAR145B1 review
Show 6 more courses
CULARTS1 review
CULIN24851 review
CULINARYARTS1 review
FOOD145A1 review
FOODSERVICES1 review
JAQUISUX1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values