AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Angelia Jones

PSYCH24 · PSYCH1 · PSYCHOLOGY · COLLEGE1 · COLL001 · PSYCH021 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesReads from textbookWastes class timeMandatory attendanceSelf-teach required
  • Overwhelmingly negative reviews call her one of the .
  • Lectures are described as to tests.
  • , and unclear instructions frustrate students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Content is not always hard, but and strict no-late-work policies make a and attendance.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Material itself can be easy if you read the book, but poor lectures and group work make the experience feel harder than it should.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Multiple and being crazy about attendance.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Almost every student and rates quality near the bottom.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

No late work accepted and , and book-based tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of reading, presentations, group work, and frequent tests requiring textbook study.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say she reads the , and wastes most of class on attendance and groups.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of group projects, paragraph essays, frequent tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Students report unprepared, unclear teaching that while class and groups.

Main concern

, and lectures that do not prepare you for tests.

What students said

“ . She does not accept late ”
COLL001
“You will be teaching yourself and her class is such a waste of time.”
PSYCH1
“ ”
PSYCH021

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests require textbook reading because lectures do not align with exams; format details beyond that are limited.

Book-based testsFrequent testsGroup projectsAttendance graded

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

lectures, plus group projects and attendance grades.

Must read the book for testsTests every class sometimesGroup projectsAttendance graded
“ because her lectures are horrible.”
PSYCH1
“ group presentations.”
PSYCHOLOGY

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Probably one of the . You will be teaching yourself and her class is such a waste of time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting poor teaching and classroom frustration. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She knows her stuff, but .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ if you don't want to waste your time.”

⏱️ Class Time Use

10/100

“Takes 20 minutes to take attendance for a class of 40 something.”

📚 Self-Teaching Required

20/100

“Basically reads from the book as her lecture, so basically just read from your book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Her lectures have nothing to do with the tests whatsoever
  • lectures are like poor student presentations.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She does not accept late work
  • Grade is , and tests
  • she gives a grade for attendance as well.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • WEREN'T IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
  • Pointless class.
  • lack of preparedness

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nine highly consistent negative reviews from 2015-2016 with detailed classroom anecdotes and aligned quality scores.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

COLL0012 reviews
PSYCH12 reviews
PSYCH242 reviews
COLLEGE11 review
PSYCH0211 review
Show 1 more courses
PSYCHOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1