AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Gilda Ilano-Teal

NURS137 · NURSN51L · N137PHARMACOLO · NURS50L · NURS52L · NUR50 · NUR0000 · N50L · N50 · LAB50 · NURS50 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Prefer her for clinicals if you are proactive and self-directed; be cautious if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProExcellent clinical instructorPolarizing theoryLanguage barrierMotherly but intimidatingEasy quizzes if you read
  • Clinical teaching is frequently praised as excellent, motherly, and hands-on.
  • some find them clear enough with and disorganized.
  • , and staying off her bad side.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

if you read carefully, but and clinical standards still require preparation.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Nursing content is manageable for prepared students yet theory confusion and critical thinking items raise the challenge.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

the door once lecture begins.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Strongly recommended for clinicals by many, but as a last choice.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some report easy quizzes and hard-to-fail checkoffs; and favoritism.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reading, handouts, quizzes, and clinical prep matter; not usually described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Clinical teaching is often excellent, but theory clarity and organization are frequently criticized.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of textbook-based quizzes, theory tests, and clinical checkoffs.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

many love her clinical mentoring, while theory lectures draw complaints about clarity, organization, favorites, and language barrier.

Main concern

Theory lectures and .

What students said

“She is an EXCELLENT clinical instructor. She's very sweet and motherly, not intimidating”
NURS52L
“She is WORST, HORRIBLE teacher ever I met in my life. but the .”
NUR0000
“Whatever she go over with the textbook is whatever gonna be in her quiz.”
NURS50L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes often match readings and handouts, while as .

Textbook-aligned quizzesCritical-thinking test itemsClinical checkoffs

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture coverage; and demand careful reading.

Textbook-aligned quizzesConfusing theory testsClinical checkoffs
“Whatever she go over with the textbook is whatever gonna be in her quiz.”
NURS50L
“ but the .”
NUR0000
“ , but they made you think critically.”
NURS50L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is an EXCELLENT clinical instructor. She's very sweet and motherly, not intimidating, and she's always looking out for opportunities at clinicals for her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 In person reviews, highlighting clinical excellence, theory polarization, and quiz patterns. Credibility rating: High.

🏥 Clinical Strength

85/100

“She is an EXCELLENT clinical instructor. She's very sweet and motherly, not intimidating”

📚 Theory Clarity Issues

30/100

“She is WORST, HORRIBLE teacher ever I met in my life. but the .”

📖

58/100

“Just pay attention in class along with open your text book. You will pass.”

⚠️ Polarizing Experience

48/100

“ ... Negative: you will not learn much from this instructor”

Theme 1

🏥 About Clinical Teaching

  • EXCELLENT clinical instructor
  • always looking out for opportunities at clinicals
  • You will learn a lot in the clinical setting

Theme 2

📚 About Theory & Clarity

  • but the
  • and
  • boring lectures and not so

Theme 3

📈

  • !! just read the book and her handouts CAREFULLY
  • EZ quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

22 in-person reviews spanning many years show consistent polarization between strong clinical praise and mixed theory critiques.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

NURS1374 reviews
NURS504 reviews
NURS50L3 reviews
N502 reviews
N50L2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
NUR00002 reviews
LAB501 review
N137PHARMACOLO1 review
NUR501 review
NURS52L1 review
NURSN51L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values