AI Rate Professor

Science

Katherine Marsh

BIO11 · MICRO02 · BIO011 · MICR002 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already have a strong science background and and the lab manual.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesI don't know answersBoring slidesAmbiguous quizzesAvoid without background
  • , and unclear.
  • Students report frequent I don't know answers and .
  • Some can still earn As by studying PowerPoints, but many find material ambiguous.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some report As from PowerPoint study, but , and poor grading clarity.

; in-person reviews split between PowerPoint As and confusion.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and strong background.

Online BIO11 was rated very hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Several reviews state attendance is mandatory for credit-bearing sections.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

, and weak answers, with only limited praise.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students cite poor or ambiguous grading despite some high final grades from independent PowerPoint study.

Format shift

; in-person reviews are mixed.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Group work, lab manual, quizzes, and PowerPoint study create .

Format shift

Lab and group work appear mainly in in-person micro reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and I don't know answers outweigh limited patient or nice comments.

Format shift

Negative tone is consistent across online and in-person formats.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Quizzes, group assignments, labs, and PowerPoint-based study all factor into assessment.

Format shift

; group assignments called out online.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person micro and , and slide-heavy; a minority say PowerPoint study and .

Main concern

and weak answers when students ask questions.

What students said

“The lecture ”
MICRO02
“If you do not have a strong background in ”
MICR002
“Study the PowerPoints thoroughly and you will get an A”
MICR002

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online BIO11 , and frequent inability to answer subject questions.

Main concern

Ambiguous online group work instructions and .

What students said

“Most of the as information regarding a group assignment, as well as really poor grading”
BIO11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention vague quiz material and PowerPoint .

Ambiguous quizzesPowerPoint-based studyLab manual required

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report ambiguous quizzes and reliance on .

Ambiguous quizzesPowerPoint study
“ambiguous quizzes and material that was provided to study for the ”
BIO011

Online

Online comments focus on unclear assignment info and .

Unclear online assignmentsPoor grading
“ as information regarding a group assignment, as well as really poor grading”
BIO11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do not have a strong background in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (1 online, 4 in person), highlighting clarity problems and mixed grade outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Very long and clear example's”

❓

20/100

“30% of the " as if she was incapable of teaching the class”

📉 Recommendation

22/100

“The lecture ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • extremely boring lecture

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Study the PowerPoints thoroughly and you will get an A
  • ambiguous quizzes and material

Theme 3

🧪

  • The
  • and she will help you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed 2015 reviews with consistent criticism of clarity, though sample is small and grades are mixed.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MICR0022 reviews
BIO0111 review
BIO111 review
MICRO021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1