AI Rate Professor

Science

Asharie Campbell

PYSO001 · MIC002 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if and tolerate inconsistent lecture clarity.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDense science contentPowerPoint heavyExtra credit availableEngaging when clearInconsistent lecture clarity
  • Subject is dense science; success , and hard work
  • Some praise engagement, humor, and that supports an A
  • Others warn of , heavy busywork, poor email response, and no

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

helps, but , and heavy assignments still demand serious effort for a high grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students call the subject dense and not easy; average difficulty is high for a science prerequisite.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Two reviews are cautiously positive; one strongly says stay far away due to confusion and support issues.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

About +8% is available, but and some say EC barely helps.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many assignments, quizzes, study guides, labs/projects, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some find her engaging and ; others report lecture-PowerPoint contradictions and poor email response.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

One review states grade is 60% labs/project and 40% exams, with quizzes and study guides also common.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person science courses with dense , and mixed instructor clarity.

Main concern

, and poor email support for some students.

What students said

“Professor Campbell makes light of a very dense subject. Study the PowerPoints and read the book”
PYSO001
“What she says in lecture is always the opposite of the powerpoint. Doesn't answer emails. STAY FAR FAR AWAY!!!”
MIC002

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; labs/projects and quizzes add weight.

Exams uncurvedLabs and projectsQuizzesStudy guides

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

/projects and frequent quizzes; study PowerPoints carefully.

40% exams60% labs/projectNo exam curveMany quizzes
“Grade is 60% labs/project and 40% exams. ... .”
PYSO001
“ , and study guide.”
MIC002

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“What she says in lecture is always the opposite of the powerpoint. Doesn't answer emails. STAY FAR FAR AWAY!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting mixed teaching clarity, heavy science workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is very engaging and hilarious.”

📚 Study Strategy

40/100

“Study the PowerPoints and read the book if .”

⚠️ Major Red Flag

20/100

“What she says in lecture is always the opposite of the powerpoint. Doesn't answer emails. STAY FAR FAR AWAY!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Campbell makes light of a very dense subject
  • She is very engaging and hilarious

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's not an easy class but its not suppose to be
  • She gives roughly +8% total, and
  • , and study guide

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews with mixed polarity give useful detail but limited consensus over time.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PYSO0012 reviews
MIC0021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values