AI Rate Professor

Speech

Jason Baumwirt

SPCH006 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can self-manage a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow Email RepliesUnclear Due DatesHeavy Online WorkloadInconsistent ModulesMixed Organization
  • Both reviews flag very slow responses to student messages.
  • Online structure issues include missing module items and .
  • One student still liked him as a teacher despite the chaos.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

One B is reported and no free-A claims appear; workload is high enough that grades require sustained effort.

Online and and communication friction, not free grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students call the class a lot of work and even a recipe for disaster when organization fails.

Both formats mention heavy workload; online adds module confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

; other format gives no flexibility signal.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

One student liked him, but both stress slow responses and organizational problems that hurt the experience.

Online is warmer on teaching quality; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; one reported B with main complaints about organization.

Format shift

Sparse grade evidence across both formats.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Described as a lot of work, especially in a crunch course, with many assignments to track.

Format shift

Online review emphasizes workload most clearly.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

One student liked him as a teacher while both criticize communication and course organization.

Format shift

Online review is more positive on teaching; the other is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments focus on assignment due dates and weekly modules rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss assignments and messaging, not exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Tagged in-person review still describes online-class chaos with and ignored messages.

Main concern

and poor communication.

What students said

“Due dates of and inconsistent. He often ignores messages.”
SPCH006

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online section had liked teaching but and .

Main concern

Slow messaging and incomplete module details during crunch weeks.

What students said

“while taking his online class he took ”
33294

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears assignment-driven.

Assignment HeavyNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

rather than exams.

Unclear Due DatesNo Exam Detail
“Due dates of and inconsistent.”
SPCH006

Online

Online comments discuss modules and assignments, not proctored exams.

Module AssignmentsNo Exam Detail
“ the module”
33294

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Due dates of and inconsistent. He often ignores messages.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in-person tagged), focusing on communication and organization themes. Credibility rating: Low.

📧 Slow Communication

30/100

“he took ”

🗂️ Organization Gaps

35/100

“ the module”

👍 Mixed Teaching Feel

60/100

“I really liked him as a teacher”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication

  • He often ignores messages
  • took
  • If

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Structure

  • This class is a lot of work
  • Due dates of
  • recipe for disaster

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews with mixed quality and limited grade detail make confidence low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

332941 review
SPCH0061 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values