AI Rate Professor

English

Lisa Gaydosh

ENG1A · 1C · ENGL1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Expect a but brace for and mixed experiences.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed reviewsTough graderHelpful when engagedTextbook usedInconsistent feedback
  • One student praises her as extremely helpful and easy to get an A with effort.
  • Another reports praise on a and calls her a .
  • Sample is tiny and old, so confidence in any single narrative is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student says participate, read, and ask for help and you will get an A; another got a .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range with no strong consensus that content is easy or brutal.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At ; other reviews do not expand on policy.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Strong praise for help and care is offset by a and a blank review.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Called a ; D.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Textbooks and papers matter; no consistent report of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Helpful and caring for some students, but .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English experiences split between super helpful support and .

Main concern

work may be called good then graded poorly.

What students said

“Very Awesome teacher i know that my english is not the best but ”
ENGL1A
“ and said it was good and . shes a .”
1C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and .

Paper-focused assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment discussed mainly as ; exams are not clearly described.

Paper grading
“ and said it was good and . shes a .”
1C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and said it was good and . shes a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with mixed detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🤝 Helpfulness

70/100

“ and answered all my emails when i asked for help!”

⚖️

30/100

“shes a .”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“Participate in her class read the book and ask for help if you need it and you will get an A”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • SUPER AWESOME
  • extremely helpful and answered all my emails

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • shes a .
  • you will get an A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews span 2008-2015, one has no comment, and opinions conflict sharply.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

1C1 review
ENG1A1 review
ENGL1A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1