AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Evelyn Gomez

ENGR10 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take if you want a real intro to engineering work and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear expectationsProject-heavyEngineering mindsetGroup work unevenWhy-focused
  • Single review says students learn what and reports.
  • , but group partners may not contribute, forcing solo report writing.
  • Success depends on understanding the why behind work, not just trailing the group.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Difficulty is rated high and success requires ownership of projects and deep focus on the why.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Rated difficult and project-report heavy rather than light conceptual work.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

The only review calls it a great class that teaches real engineering value despite uneven group work.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

No free-A claims; clarity of requirements is praised more than grade generosity.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Multiple project reports and the need to carry weak partners make the workload substantial.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Described as and effective at teaching real engineering purpose.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on group projects and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person ENGR10 review praises clear expectations and and reports.

Main concern

Uneven group partners can leave you writing many reports alone.

What students said

“This was a great class and I learned a lot about what it really means to be an engineer”
ENGR10
“ ”
ENGR10
“You really need to focus on the "why" to do well”
ENGR10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The single in-person review focuses on projects and .

Project reports
“My partners for so I had to write many reports myself”
ENGR10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was a great class and I learned a lot about what it really means to be an engineer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting project learning and group-work risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Real engineering learning

75/100

“I learned a lot about what it really means to be an engineer”

📋

80/100

“ ”

🛠️

35/100

“My partners for so I had to write many reports myself”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You really need to focus on the "why" to do well

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Teams

  • I had to write many reports myself

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2014 limits reliability despite decent detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values