AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Rachelle Arizmendi

NUTRITION11 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage an online nutrition course with little instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor Online CommunicationOutdated Due DatesAll or Nothing GradingUnresponsive EmailsTextbook Dependent
  • Two of three online reviews call her unresponsive and disengaged, with .
  • Students report stale due dates and .
  • One student found her helpful with tech issues, so experiences are mixed but lean negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Content difficulty is modest, but and ungraded work can block an easy A.

All evidence comes from online reviews; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Nutrition material is not described as intellectually brutal, but course management issues raise friction.

All evidence comes from online reviews; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

As a fully online class with .

All evidence comes from online reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Majority of reviews call her among the , and zero investment.

All evidence comes from online reviews; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

One review says incomplete work earns nothing and .

Format shift

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload itself is not the main complaint; communication and .

Format shift

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most students say she uses canned textbook lectures and rarely engages or replies.

Format shift

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments center on online submissions, due dates, and .

Format shift

All evidence comes from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online nutrition sections suffer from weak communication, outdated course shell details, and .

Main concern

Students often get no email replies and .

What students said

“ and she won't grade your stuff even if you do half the work, its all or nothing.”
NUTRITION11
“ and it's only accentuated by the fact that it's an online class and her communication efforts are nonexistent.”
NUTRITION11
“ and alternatives for what didn't work out”
3671

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews focus on assignments and , so .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible. and it's only accentuated by the fact that it's an online class and her communication efforts are nonexistent.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 online reviews, highlighting communication and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She doesn't appear to put any investment or time into her students; she just uses the textbook lectures.”

📧 Communication Problems

18/100

“ .”

⚠️

28/100

“she won't grade your stuff even if you do half the work, its all or nothing.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • never updates the due dates so for the fall term all the due dates are for April and May.
  • her communication efforts are nonexistent.
  • She always answered , and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • its all or nothing.
  • probably the .
  • I liked my nutrition class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older online reviews exist, with mixed detail and limited grade data, so confidence is low.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NUTRITION112 reviews
36711 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1