AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Uyekawa Mary

CALC · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; the only available student voice is strongly negative.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelfishNarrow-MindedAvoidHigh DifficultyPoor Experience
  • and difficulty at the top.
  • The student describes the professor as selfish and narrow-minded.
  • There is not enough .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

The sole review pairs bottom quality with top difficulty and offers no path to a good grade.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Difficulty is rated 5/5 in the only available review.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student wishes they could erase the professor from memory.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

No positive grading comments exist; overall tone implies a .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload details are not described in the available review.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

The only student frames the experience as something to erase from memory.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person calculus review is strongly negative about personality and experience.

Main concern

Very limited data; the sole review is extremely unfavorable.

What students said

“sel++fish, narrow**minded. wish I could erase her from memory”
CALC

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

review.

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“sel++fish, narrow**minded. wish I could erase her from memory”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with strongly negative tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Overall Experience

8/100

“wish I could erase her from memory”

👎 Personality Concerns

10/100

“sel++fish, narrow**minded”

Theme 1

💔 About Overall Experience

  • wish I could erase her from memory
  • sel++fish, narrow**minded

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one short, highly negative 2014 review exists, so confidence in broader patterns is low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CALC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values