AI Rate Professor

Art

David Em

ART56 · ART056 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take only if and push for .

Best fit · Self Taught ProKnowledgeable but uneven teachingVague assignment briefsArt history digressionsHelpful when engagedMixed Photoshop experience
  • Students and motivating versus vague and off-topic.
  • Digital art tools are taught, but long art-history talk and thin guidelines frustrate many.
  • if you are self-directed with Photoshop and Illustrator.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A+ is possible with effort, but and practice software on your own.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is beginner digital tools, but lack of examples and digressions make it harder than it should be.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

One student advises not missing class; .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Some call him awesome and motivating; others say he cannot teach and waste class time.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

; limited grade data beyond one A+.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and related tools.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Knowledgeable and sometimes motivating, but vague guidelines and off-topic talks hurt teaching.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on digital design projects and assignments, not exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

with vague briefs and long art-history tangents that waste lab time for some students.

Main concern

and off-topic lectures reduce hands-on learning.

What students said

“ and . He gave great advice.”
ART56
“we would sit at least an hour or so just talking about art History: and I felt like I never got anything done in that class.”
ART056
“ .”
ART56

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe software projects and .

Project-based assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person feedback points to assignment-driven grading with .

Project-based assessment
“ . Try not to miss class! Good Luck!”
ART56

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. Em seems very knowledgeable in his field, but he doesn't seem to know how to teach others very well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, content focus, and split recommendations. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ and a good teacher. I learned alot of stuffs from him.”

⚠️ Assignment Clarity

40/100

“I wished he gave more guidelines for ”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ ! .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and
  • he doesn't seem to know how to teach others very well
  • Efficient in explanation

Theme 2

🖥️ About Course Content

  • sit at least an hour or so just talking about art History
  • We did Photoshop, Illustrator, Maya, Corel Painter etc
  • create a world in Illustrator ? that's it

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very motivating
  • Great instructor
  • ABSOLUTELY USELESS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six mixed in-person reviews from 2006-2013 show polarized views with moderate detail and no recent sample.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART565 reviews
ART0561 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values