Shant Shohian

ENG1B · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 86/100
RMP rating: 5.0/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 3.0

The decision

Looks like a fun, high-energy Eng 1B teacher who rewards serious work, but only one review exists so treat that praise carefully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHigh energyFunny and sharpSerious about rewritesMakes you thinkRecommended

Single glowing review calls him interesting, funny, sharp, and a pleasure to attend.
He takes writing seriously; rewrites matter and word use is a real focus.
Very limited data means confidence is low despite the perfect quality score.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The only review implies a solid grade needs rewrites and serious work, not coasting.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty rated moderate; focus on word use and rewrites suggests standard college English rigor.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

The sole review opens with Recommended and praises him as an all-around great teacher.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Student owned a weaker grade for skipping rewrites, suggesting .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Rewrites and careful word work are expected; overall load is not described as light or crushing.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Described as interesting, high energy, funny, sharp, and a pleasure to learn from.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Rewrites and attention to .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One student found his in-person class high energy, funny, and intellectually sharp, with serious expectations on rewrites.

Main concern

Only one review; personal grade suffered when rewrites were skipped.

What students said

“Recommended! All around great teacher and good guy. Interesting, high energy, funny and sharp.”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; writing rewrites appear central.

RewritesWord-use focus

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; student success hinged on completing rewrites.

Rewrites expected

“I didn't do as well as I hoped, but it was because I didn't do the rewrites. It was my own fault.”
ENG1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Recommended! All around great teacher and good guy. Interesting, high energy, funny and sharp. What a pleasure it was to attend his class.”
Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review highlighting energy and rewrite expectations. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Interesting, high energy, funny and sharp. What a pleasure it was to attend his class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“Recommended! All around great teacher and good guy.”

✍️ Work Expectations

55/100

“He is serious about the work so , but enjoy the humor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Interesting, high energy, funny and sharp.
He will make you think about word use.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

I didn't do as well as I hoped, but it was because I didn't do the rewrites.
He is serious about the work so .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2013, so scores rest on a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values