AI Rate Professor

Performing/Communication Arts

Julie Mallard

SPCH1A · SPCH10 · SPCH1 · SPEEC6868 · SPEEC2164 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are outgoing, ready to participate boldly, and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOutspoken and funHas favoritesParticipation heavyDifficult graderNot for shy students
  • Many , and helpful if they embrace participation.
  • Others report attitude, favoritism, and unprofessional personal tangents.
  • Expect , and stricter grading on speeches.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One student calls her a , so a high grade still requires strong performance and rule-following.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content and , but public speaking challenges and participation raise the real difficulty.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Participation is required and she enforces class rules such as no cell phones.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Enthusiastic fans love the fun vibe, while others warn about attitude and favoritism.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Multiple notes of and uneven favoritism outweigh the easier-test comments.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Work centers on speeches and active participation rather than a huge written load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

and humor for some, but and unprofessional attitude.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades hinge on speeches, participation, and performance tasks more than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and participatory but polarizing due to personality and .

Main concern

Attitude, favorites, and public performance tasks can alienate shy or rule-sensitive students.

What students said

“Beware! This class is not for the shy people.”
SPCH1
“she is a nice professor but is has favorites if you can stay away from this class you are doing yourself a favor”
SPEEC2164

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, while heavier stakes sit on speeches and live participation.

Easy testsPerformance assignmentsParticipation-based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews mention easy tests but emphasize speeches, flash mobs, and .

Easy testsSpeech assignmentsFlash mob performance
“Easy tests.”
SPCH1
“ the whole school.”
SPCH1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Beware! This class is not for the shy people.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting fun teaching versus favoritism and strictness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎭 Teaching Personality

62/100

“She is the nicest teacher that you can meet.”

⚠️ Favoritism Risk

40/100

“she is a nice professor but is has favorites if you can stay away from this class you are doing yourself a favor”

📈

35/100

“She's very helpful and but is a .”

🗣️ Participation Pressure

22/100

“Participation is a must and she will get on your case if you break the rules like cell phone use.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very outspoken and gives you a very good description on what the
  • really cool but has attitude
  • She does have attitude. Unprofessional.

Theme 2

🎤 About Class Experience

  • This class is not for the shy people.
  • so much fun. .
  • the whole school.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness

  • is a
  • has favorites
  • I .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six mixed in-person reviews span several years with and negatives, but no grade marks.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SPCH12 reviews
SPCH101 review
SPCH1A1 review
SPEEC21641 review
SPEEC68681 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values