AI Rate Professor

Biology

John Stantzos

MICROLAB2 · MICROLAB · MICRO2 · MICRO · MICRO2LAB · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him for micro lab if you respect him, ask questions loudly, and put in study effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful lab professorPatient and kindFunny grandpa vibeHearing challengesFair but hard micro
  • Strong, caring micro lab teacher who helps students who try
  • but usually fair with study
  • Mixed older reviews on clarity and communication due to hearing issues

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

He is fair and supportive, but micro lab is still hard and requires study and effort for a strong grade.

All evidence is from in-person micro lab reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Microbiology lab content is inherently challenging, with mixed difficulty ratings around moderate-hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

and engagement matter; he allows makeups if you communicate, but being present helps a lot.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and help despite some older clarity complaints.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students say , and helps those who try without being a free A.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Lab work and studying notes or the lab book are required; micro is repeatedly called hard.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Majority praise approachable, funny, knowledgeable lab teaching; .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Lab exams and practicals are the and practice exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Most students love his kindness, humor, and lab support, while a .

Main concern

Hearing issues and and self-study.

What students said

“Truly a great professor. He cares and will help all students whenever they need it.”
MICRO2
“He has trouble hearing, so speak loud and be patient.”
MICROLAB
“He grades fair and gives you hints on the test :)”
MICRO2LAB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Lab exams are difficult but usually fair; a few .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but often fair, with hints and practice materials mentioned.

Lab ExamsStudy GuidesPractice Exams
“the but not unreasonable”
MICRO2
“He grades fair and gives you hints on the test :)”
MICRO2LAB
“ .”
MICRO

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Truly a great professor. He cares and will help all students whenever they need it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews, highlighting caring lab support versus micro difficulty. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Care

88/100

“He cares and will help all students whenever they need it.”

🧪 Lab Teaching

80/100

“Dr. Stantzos is a .”

⚖️ Fair Difficulty

58/100

“the but not unreasonable”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very approachable and
  • keep the class engaged with his terrific sense of humor
  • just like my own grandpa

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but not unreasonable
  • He grades fair and gives you hints on the test
  • Micro is a hard class

Theme 3

👂 About Communication

  • He has trouble hearing, so speak loud and be patient
  • if you have a question, you have to yell or go RIGHT NEXT to him
  • He rarely answers questions for you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews from 2004-2013 show a for balanced confidence.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MICRO27 reviews
MICRO2LAB5 reviews
MICRO3 reviews
MICROLAB2 reviews
MICROLAB21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values