AI Rate Professor

Natural Sciences

Nancy Roback

CHEM22 · CHEM102 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Wait for her chemistry section if you want hard material taught clearly by a professor who will not let you fail.

Best fit · Effort For RewardBest Chem ProfessorCrystal Clear LecturesWill Not Let You FailFriendly and SmilingWorth the Wait
  • Students call her the and .
  • Material is real chemistry difficulty, but and help make As achievable with study.
  • Friendly attitude, useful PowerPoints, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students report As are possible through strong teaching and study, not because the class is a free A.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Chemistry content is repeatedly called hard or tough, even with excellent teaching.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Near-unanimous praise with and the .

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and say she will not let you fail, though hard work still matters for an A.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and multi-hour test prep are common; not featherlight chemistry.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

, and ability to make weak chemistry students succeed.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Lecture and lab both matter; tests are short answer and the .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but highly praised for , and real support that turns weak students into A earners.

Main concern

Chemistry remains hard; without studying you should not expect an A.

What students said

“She is the best professor ever!!! ... !”
CHEM102
“Class is hard so go in with caution and seek help.”
CHEM22
“without studying, do not think for an A.”
CHEM22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are mostly short answer and the ; .

Short Answer TestsMultiple Choice FinalLecture and Lab Based

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final; no clear proctoring details.

Short Answer TestsMultiple Choice Final
“ but .”
CHEM22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the best professor ever!!! ... !”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews highlighting clear chem teaching and earned grades. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“I'm terrible at chemistry and got an A-not because she was easy, but because she knows the material so well she can help anyone understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ ... !”

📚 Course Challenge

35/100

“This class is tough, but I think that goes for any chemistry class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and makes learning chemistry fun by adding videos of cool reactions to her lecture.
  • her lectures are very useful and crystal.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • without studying, do not think for an A.
  • i got an A because i spent about 5 hours each time before the test

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she's the nicest person you will ever meet!
  • she always smile and nice.
  • She always keeps smiling to the students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven consistently glowing reviews across CHEM courses from 2010-2013 with good detail, but sample is still modest and older.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM226 reviews
CHEM1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values