AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Zardoost Vahid

CIS8159 · CIS62 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Proceed carefully and ; grades and organization look unreliable with very thin evidence.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAssignment Tracking RiskBook-Based TestsGrade Dispute IssuesSparse ReviewsKeep Email Proof
  • One review calls the class an Easy A if you submit on time and use the book for tests.
  • Another warns he loses student work and may change grades unless .
  • Only two reviews exist, so confidence in any overall pattern is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

One student reports an Easy A with on-time work and open book use, but the other had a .

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews; no online reviews in the authoritative counts.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Both reviews rate difficulty low around 2, focusing more on process reliability than hard content.

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

One glowing Easy A review is offset by a severe lost-work and grade-integrity complaint.

All counted evidence is from the two in-person-labeled reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Book-supported tests can help, but a reported A-to-B grade change undercuts trust.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Main work is turning in assignments and using the book for tests, with low reported difficulty.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

One positive course-management report versus one strong complaint about lost work and no responsibility.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades hinge on submitted assignments plus book-based tests .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and they conflict: one Easy A path via book and deadlines, one serious lost-work and grade dispute warning.

Main concern

Lost assignments and grade changes without accountability are the main risk.

What students said

“Turn in the and use the book for the tests and you WILL pass this class! Easy A!”
CIS62
“he loses them and ”
CIS8159

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One review says using the book for tests leads to passing, but .

Book Allowed On TestsAssignment Based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and assignment submission as the core assessment path.

Book Allowed On TestsAssignment Submission Risk
“use the book for the tests and you WILL pass this class! Easy A!”
CIS62
“make sure you keep copies of ”
CIS8159

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“make sure you keep copies of all your assignments you send to this guy, he loses them and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews with conflicting Easy A and lost-work themes. Credibility rating: Low.

📈 Easy A Claim

76/100

“Turn in the and use the book for the tests and you WILL pass this class! Easy A!”

⚠️

20/100

“he said my final grade was "A" then, when it cam out i got a "B",careful!”

🎯 Teaching Reliability

45/100

“he loses them and ”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A!
  • you WILL pass this class
  • i got a "B",careful!

Theme 2

⚠️ About Organization Risk

  • he loses them
  • Always keep emails you send to any college professors!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews from 2012-2013 provide thin, inconsistent evidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIS621 review
CIS81591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values