AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Jerome B Ferrell

CIS2266 · CIS · CIS10 · CS2 · CIS14 · ENGENG · CIS62 · CIS1 · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take him for a light CIS/CS grade boost if , but skip if .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy A for GPABoring LecturesMidterm and Final HeavyTest CurveMixed Reviews
  • Many students call CIS10 an easy A and final.
  • and reviews heavily, but .
  • chill and funny for some, rude or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many report easy As with curves and basic review, though a .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is often called basic or breezy, especially CIS10, but programming tracks can feel uneven.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

Students say and you do not need to be there every day.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but many warn against him if you want strong teaching or CS readiness.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Curves and easy grade floors help many students, though a few report harsh or random test outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

; grade usually hinges on midterm and final.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and caring; many others call lectures boring, off-topic, or .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Most classes are driven by midterm and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but leans easy-grade: many praise curves and , while others cite boring lectures, unclear teaching, and unfair test questions.

Main concern

and inconsistent exam fairness can surprise .

What students said

“ .”
CIS10
“very easy!! and final... take his class and you'll get A easily.”
CIS10
“Some of his questions on his mid term and or in his lecture.”
CIS10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but fairness reports conflict.

Midterm and Final OnlyHeavy CurveReview SessionsMultiple ChoiceSome Uncovered Material

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person grades usually rest on a midterm and and pre-test review.

Midterm and FinalCurveStudy Guide ReviewVocabulary Focus
“Grade is solely based on midterm & final (~50 easy multiple choice questions).”
CIS10
“ and final.For an A you need a 35/50.”
CIS10
“ his book or lecture.”
CIS10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, balancing easy-grade praise against teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Easy Grade Path

78/100

“I barely studied and I got an A in he class.”

😴 Boring but Chill

55/100

“Easy class, but VERY boring.”

📝

45/100

“Some of his questions on his mid term and or in his lecture.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He is a really easy A
  • Over half the class got A's
  • it is a good class to bring up your GPA

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's really boring but everyone gets a C or above
  • spends a lot of time talking about his past jobs
  • Cannot teach!

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams and Workload

  • and final
  • Does not grade hw
  • Everything he reviews is on the test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

easy-grade core with a real split on teaching quality and exam fairness.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 517
3 out of 511
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CIS1027 reviews
CS211 reviews
CIS624 reviews
CIS143 reviews
CIS12 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CIS1 review
CIS22661 review
ENGENG1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Fail 1