AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Raymond Guzman

MATH5A · MATH8 · MATH · MATH9 · CALC5A · MATH95A5B · MATH5AWINTER · MATH5A9 · TRIG · 5A · MATH5B · MATH134 · MATH5 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

; most students say unclear teaching and and confidence.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCannot teachHarsh graderSarcastic and meanSelf-teach requiredAvoid if possible
  • Most students say and you must teach yourself.
  • Many report harsh or , and a hostile classroom tone.
  • A if you follow his prep, but the overall warning is stay away.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Many say an A is nearly impossible or , though a few claim easy tests if .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material and tests feel hard for most because .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; some imply showing up still does not help learning.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Dominant advice is do not take him, with extreme language about ruined careers and wasted time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Frequent reports of , and near-impossible As.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Homework and , but the bigger issue is learning without useful lectures.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most call him unclear, unprepared, rude, or the worst math teacher they have had.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Success hinges on difficult or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Large set of in-person math reviews overwhelmingly describe unclear lectures, sarcasm, and hard or .

Main concern

, mean tone toward students, and grades that can tank transfer GPAs.

What students said

“He can't teach.He's mean and sarcastic to students. .”
MATH134
“You basically have to learn it on your own if you really want to pass the class.”
MATH8
“ ! its almost IMPOSSIBLE to get an A.”
MATH5A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and students say class does not prepare them.

Difficult testsHarsh point deductionsIn-person examsSelf-study required

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as difficult or graded very harshly with little lecture support.

Difficult testsHarsh gradingUnclear lecture prep
“ .”
MATH134
“ so hard, but he took off a .”
MATH5A
“ and grades them difficulty.”
MATH8

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn, want to get a good grade, and have a decent gpa to transfer.STAY AWAY!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“THIS IS THE .”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“ if he is the last math teacher alive.”

⚖️

24/100

“its almost IMPOSSIBLE to get an A.”

📚 Self-Teaching Required

20/100

“I taught myself everything!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He can't teach.He's mean and sarcastic to students.
  • ! Not nice! Make fun of students!
  • he doesn't even know what he is talking about.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • almost everyone failed, he does not know how to teach
  • he grades very hard but
  • ~~ If you don't get an A in his class, Ur stupid..

Theme 3

⚠️ Warnings

  • STAY AWAY!
  • !!!
  • Guzman is the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty mostly detailed reviews over several years show strong consistency in negative teaching and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 57
1 out of 533

Course coverage

MATH5A17 reviews
MATH911 reviews
MATH88 reviews
MATH5B3 reviews
MATH5A92 reviews
Show 9 more courses
5A1 review
81 review
CALC5A1 review
MATH1 review
MATH1341 review
MATH51 review
MATH5AWINTER1 review
MATH95A5B1 review
TRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values