AI Rate Professor

History

Hodge Derek

HIST16 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Too little evidence to trust; skip unless .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice guyWeak classroom controlConfusing lecturesLost passion
  • Only one dated review exists for HIST16.
  • Student liked him personally but and classroom control weak.
  • Appears experienced yet disengaged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty rated easy-moderate, but no grade details show what earning an A actually costs.

Single in-person review only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Difficulty 2/5 with no mention of heavy content; main friction is lecture clarity, not raw hardness.

Single in-person review only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Single in-person review only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Quality rated 2; student liked him as a person but would not call him a strong teacher.

Single in-person review only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Workload

Light

70/100

Low difficulty rating and .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Informative at times but and seems to have lost passion.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

personable instructor with and weak classroom control.

Main concern

Confusion if you .

What students said

“not the ”
HIST16

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A nice guy, and personally, I liked him, but not the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🙂 Personable but Weak Control

35/100

“A nice guy, and personally, I liked him, but not the .”

😕 Lecture Confusion

35/100

“he has trouble remembering which info is in which section of the reading”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not the
  • results in a lot of confusion if you don't clarify with him
  • seems like he's lost his passion for the field

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2012 review with limited detail and no corroboration.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values