AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Stana Milanovich

PHOTO26 · PHOTO26A · PHOTO21 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Run unless you want a demanding film intro and can self-note every lecture.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStay away warningsNote-taking overloadHard trick examsScattered lecturesHigh dropout vibe
  • Many and little learning.
  • , and based on oral lectures with no handouts.
  • A minority later appreciates film rigor and strict standards once working in the field.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even students who earned an A report 3-4 hours a day editing plus difficult oral-based tests with little preparation help.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content combines heavy note load, restrictions on projects, long lectures, and .

Difficulty consensus is from in-person PHOTO26A and related courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, so missing class is framed as a path to failure.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most reviews say stay away, with repeated complaints of poor teaching and wasted money despite a few positive holdouts.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report , and only occasional final padding as relief.

Format shift

Strictness evidence is entirely in-person.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Note-taking overload plus multi-hour editing and class.

Format shift

Workload complaints are all in-person.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Scattered lectures, illegible writing, lateness, and hard-to-follow teaching outweigh the minority who later valued her rigor.

Format shift

Teaching quality is judged from 15 in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grade risk comes from hard quizzes or tests plus restricted film projects and note-dependent lectures.

Format shift

Assessment mix described only for in-person sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person film and photo classes draw frequent stay-away reviews for messy , and high attrition, with a smaller set finding the rigor useful later.

Main concern

Scattered teaching, note overload, and little.

What students said

“ . Very useless, horrible teacher.”
PHOTO26A
“STAY AWAY!!! Missed 5+ classes and very disappointed.”
PHOTO26A
“ and challenging but IMHO very entertaining.”
PHOTO26A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

without notes handouts, and students warn about tricky wording.

Oral lecture-based testsNo handoutsTrick questionsLong challenging examsNote overload

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, run long and challenging, and include tricky wording.

Oral lecture-based testsNo handoutsTrick questionsLong challenging exams
“ in class and she does not hand out notes”
PHOTO26A
“Be very careful of !”
PHOTO26A
“ ”
PHOTO26A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Very useless, horrible teacher. You won't learn much in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews, highlighting stay-away warnings versus minority rigor praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🏃 Stay Away Consensus

20/100

“STAY AWAY!!! Missed 5+ classes and very disappointed.”

📝 Note Overload

22/100

“NOTE-taking OVERLOAD, UNNECESSARY ”

🎬 Minority Rigor Praise

70/100

“there are a lot of restrictions on the film projects but rightly so, since there will always be restrictions”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures that she gives are very and her writing is illegible
  • Her notes/lectures were scattered and messy
  • she seemed to not want to be there at all

Theme 2

📈

  • I was putting in 3-4 hours a day, 4 days a week to edit
  • Class of WI/2011 had 10 people remaining out of 40

Theme 3

❤️ About Character & Later Value

  • she was a super nice teacher and doesnt put up with nonsense
  • she genuinely wants her students to succeed and be better filmmakers
  • Very friendly, interested in her craft, and into teaching

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen detailed in-person reviews spanning several years show a consistent negative majority with a .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PHOTO26A13 reviews
PHOTO211 review
PHOTO261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values