AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alina Daych

MATH131 · MATH7A · MATH125 · ALGEB125 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Skip if and ; only take if schedule forces it and you already know the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRushed LecturesMassive HomeworkUnclear TeachingRare HW CollectionChallenging Tests
  • Lectures often feel rushed with little room for questions.
  • .
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

to pass, and at least one student reported not getting the A they were told they needed.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Algebra content is standard difficulty but rushed pacing and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state a , so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most comments describe unclear teaching, heavy or , and frustration rather than strong endorsement.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some find her approachable, but and an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students report rarely collects it.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A , but many say she rushes, is hard to reach, or talks unclearly.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, so and practice is still essential.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person algebra and math courses draw mixed praise for niceness but frequent criticism for , and tough tests.

Main concern

and if you need support.

What students said

“She assigns massive amount of homework and she tends to rush over lecture and doesn't give room for people with questions.”
MATH125
“She is such a bad teacher, couldn't even teach! The whole time she is teaching she was basically just talking to the .”
ALGEB125
“She said I only needed 59% on the . I got a 62% and she still gave me a B.”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as challenging; and chapter reviews is needed to pass.

Challenging TestsChapter Reviews MatterIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice from homework or reviews is strongly advised.

Challenging TestsChapter Reviews Matter
“ . So do ALL your hw and chapter reviews for practice, if not .”
MATH125
“She rarely collects hw and the .”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took her for winter session and it was horrible. She assigns massive amount of homework and she tends to rush over lecture and doesn't give room for people with questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2011, highlighting rush, clarity, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“The whole time she is teaching she was basically just talking to the .”

📝 Workload Pressure

35/100

“She assigns massive amount of homework and she tends to rush over lecture.”

⚖️ Grade Trust

40/100

“She said I only needed 59% on the . I got a 62% and she still gave me a B.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • rush over lecture and doesn't give room for people with questions
  • talking to the
  • nice and easy to approach if you need help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Did every day's homework,about 3 hours a day
  • if you know your stuff, it's simple

Theme 3

💻

  • rely heavily on
  • she rarely collects hw

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed but old reviews (2005-2011) show mixed yet consistent themes of rush and clarity problems.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1254 reviews
ALGEB1251 review
MATH1311 review
MATH7A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values