AI Rate Professor

Business & Computer Technology

Rae Miller

ACCT1A · ACC1A · ACCTG1A · ACCTN1A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Avoid if you want to learn accounting; only useful if you solely want an easy grade.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AWeak teachingTheory-heavy lecturesExam-driven grades
  • Multiple students call the class an easy A despite poor teaching
  • Lectures focus on theory and struggle with quantitative problem help
  • but long and hard

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Multiple reviews explicitly call it an easy A and say failing is hard if you show up and study.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content difficulty is generally low, though and hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

One review ties a good grade to studying and attending, but no strict policy is clearly proven.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Students repeatedly say he cannot teach and you will not learn accounting despite easy grades.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Students say an A is really easy and see little realistic path to fail.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Workload

Light

70/100

and class is described as easy overall.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students say lectures are boring theory, quantitative help is weak, and he cannot teach.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Five 100-point exams determine almost all points, with .

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, and easy overall grades driven by exams.

Main concern

You may get an A yet leave without real accounting skill.

What students said

“useless professor. cannot teach. but to get an A in his class was really easy.”
ACCTG1A
“EASY A!”
ACC1A
“ , but you will not learn anything about accounting.”
ACCT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some tests are open book but can be long and hard, and .

Open book testsLong hard examsExam-heavy grading

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

be long and difficult, with grades mostly exam-based.

Open book testsLong hard examsFive exams
“ but some are hard and really long.”
ACCTN1A
“5 exam 100 point each. all of .”
ACCTG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“useless professor. cannot teach. but to get an A in his class was really easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting easy grades versus weak accounting instruction. Credibility rating: Medium.

🟢 Easy A Reality

88/100

“to get an A in his class was really easy. I do not see a way how people are able to fail in this class.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“He has difficulty explaining quantitative homework problems to the class and answering thoughtful questions.”

📝

58/100

“ but some are hard and really long.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are based almost entirely on theory
  • useless professor. cannot teach
  • Too much theory and not enough general entry/year end adjustment exercises

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EASY A!
  • , but you will not learn anything about accounting
  • to get an A in his class was really easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent in-person reviews from 2009-2010 agree on easy grades and weak teaching, but the sample is old and modest.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCT1A2 reviews
ACC1A1 review
ACCTG1A1 review
ACCTN1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values