AI Rate Professor

Art

Edward Cheung

ART31A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

describing unfair grades and demeaning teaching.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnfair GradingBelittlingNot a TeacherAvoidHarsh Critic
  • Single review calls the class terrible with .
  • Professor allegedly belittles students instead of answering questions.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

The and the course difficult, with no path to an easy A described.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty is rated high and the student experience is described as .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The sole review ends with a .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Student explicitly calls the grade unfair and the overall class terrible.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload volume is not described; and teaching tone are criticized.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Described as not a good teacher who belittles students instead of answering questions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

the single review.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person ART31A review describes unfair grading and demeaning responses to questions.

Main concern

Unfair grades and dismissive treatment of student questions.

What students said

“His class is terrible, and unfair with the grade. He didn't answer the question instead he just want you know that how stupid you are.”
ART31A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in-person review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His class is terrible, and unfair with the grade. He didn't answer the question instead he just want you know that how stupid you are.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with strongly negative tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“he definatly is not a good teacher! !”

⚖️

15/100

“unfair with the grade”

👎 Recommendation

10/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • didn't answer the question
  • just want you know that how stupid you are
  • not a good teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • unfair with the grade
  • His class is terrible

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old 2010 review with no corroborating comments, so confidence is very limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART31A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values