AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ali Lashgari

MATH125 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid Ali Lashgari based on the unless you have no other math option.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHorrible experienceVery hardAvoidNo detail given
  • The only review rates quality 1 and difficulty 5.
  • The student comment is simply HORRIBLE with no constructive detail.
  • There is no positive counter-evidence in the dataset.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Difficulty is maxed at 5/5 and the an easy A.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Course difficulty is rated 5/5 with no soft skills or support mentioned.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The single .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student response is an all-caps HORRIBLE with .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

No grade data, but extreme negative tone and .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Difficulty 5/5 with no soft comments suggests heavy cognitive load for MATH125.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Sole review gives quality 1 and labels the class HORRIBLE with no positives.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single in-person MATH125 review with a quality rating of 1 and difficulty of 5.

Main concern

Extremely negative one-word experience with no mitigating comments.

What students said

“HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy for MATH125.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 sparse in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

📉 Difficulty

10/100

“HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

A single 2009 one-word review provides almost no detail, so confidence in any fine-grained score is very low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values