AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mohamad Youssef

4A · MATH3B · 3B · CALC3A · MATH2 · MATH24 · MATH26 · MATH3A · CALC3B · 299 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
81%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if , and use his study guides—great fit for students who want structured, passable calc.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEntertaining LecturesHomework-Based QuizzesStrict AttendanceStudy Guides HelpEasy A If You Keep Up
  • Most students praise clear, funny lectures and As very attainable.
  • Attendance and late-work rules are strict; a minority call him unfair, moody, or say reviews feel curated.
  • Online precalc is light with recorded lectures and an .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

and using study guides routinely yields As; quizzes pull directly from HW and .

Online precalc and if work is done.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Calc content is still math, but explanations and majors.

; online precalc described as light.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and described as important or strict, including phone and punctuality rules.

Mainly in-person; online sample does not stress flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

81/100

High would-take-again and many best-professor claims, tempered by a .

In-person dominates recommendations; few online reviews are also positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Many say exams are graded leniently and match guides, though .

Format shift

Lenient majority in person; online sample also fair.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and weekly quizzes add up but stay manageable if you keep pace; .

Format shift

Online lighter cadence; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

85/100

Dominant praise for a minority saying he wastes time or explains poorly.

Format shift

; online uses recorded lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and ; a few note only two big exams can make or break the grade.

Format shift

Similar structure online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

engaging lectures, weekly quizzes from homework, midterm .

Main concern

Strict no-late-HW policy and occasional complaints that inconsistent.

What students said

“weekly quizzes which are pretty much two problems from the homework... .”
CALC3B
“He is EXTREMELY strict abt turning HW in on time. .”
CALC3B
“The . , but he made the materials so easy to understand.”
CALC3A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Small online sample for precalc/calc describes light HW cadence, recorded lectures, and .

Main concern

Very few online reviews limit confidence beyond precalc-style structure.

What students said

“the study guide he provides is 95% similar to it. There is a .”
MATH2
“everything was online except for the .”
MATH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams usually resemble study guides and homework; midterms were harder than samples.

Study Guide MatchQuizzes From HomeworkMidterm And FinalIn-Person Final Online

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final; many say exams match study guides, a few say midterms were much harder.

Quizzes From HWStudy GuidesLenient Exam GradingNo Late Work
“ he assigns.”
CALC3B
“gave us a the actual midterm but the .”
CALC3B

Online

Online courses use online midterms and an and study guides.

In-Person FinalStudy Guide 95% MatchReview Video
“Plz don't overthink the final and 95% similar to it.”
MATH2
“everything was online except for the .”
MATH2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you keep up with the . He lectures a lot but always gives notes, which helps a ton.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (3 online, 47 , and strict attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

85/100

“The . , but he made the materials so easy to understand.”

👍 Recommendation

81/100

“If !”

📅

22/100

“the ONLY issue I have is the core”

🅰️ Grade Accessibility

80/100

“Hard not to get an A if you turn everything in.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He always comes to class with a smile on his face and makes sure everyone is happy and entertained.
  • He seems very intimidating but is actually super accomodating.
  • I ended up learning everything from YouTube.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the homework.
  • .
  • as the practice test.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Policies & Dissent

  • .
  • Be careful, these reviews are heavily curated.
  • Avoid if you can, one of the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

299

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with a large positive majority and , and study guides; minority dissent noted.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5198
4 out of 535
3 out of 523
2 out of 513
1 out of 531

Course coverage

CALC3B16 reviews
CALC3A12 reviews
MATH3A7 reviews
MATH265 reviews
MATH3B3 reviews
Show 4 more courses
3B2 reviews
4A2 reviews
MATH22 reviews
MATH241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

31

A+ 3 · A 28

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 5

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1