AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ilknur Erbas-White

MATH · MATH3B · MATH10ONLINE · ENGR20 · MATH2 · CALC3B · STATISTICS · 3A · MATH10 · ENGR30 · ENG30 · 680 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
53.51%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and handle a blunt personality; otherwise pick another math or engineering instructor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing PersonalityExtra Credit QueenDisorganized CanvasRude LecturesSelf-Teach Required
  • Student experience and rude, humiliating lecturer.
  • Many As are possible with participation, worksheets, and , but teaching clarity is often weak.
  • Attendance and participation matter; Canvas and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Many students report As , and sometimes very easy or retakeable exams if they show up and do the work.

Online students still get As but often only after heavy self-study; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is usually manageable stats or engineering math, but alone.

Both formats need self-teaching; online leans more self-paced while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and missing class hurts, especially for worksheets and pop quizzes.

In-person is consistently mandatory; some online sections are more flexible but still push lecture participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and care, while many others warn to avoid due to rudeness and disorganization.

In-person praise and hate are both loud; online leans more negative on organization and communication.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

, curves, and easy or retakeable tests help grades even when teaching is weak.

Format shift

Online and , but grade accuracy complaints appear more in person.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

, and ungraded weekly work add up across courses.

Format shift

Online students especially report many ungraded weekly tasks and messy portals.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Some find her caring and fair; .

Format shift

; online reviews focus more on disorganization.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Midterms and finals often dominate grades, sometimes 70%, with homework and participation supporting.

Format shift

Both formats are exam-heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews range from caring storyteller with , and publicly humiliating lectures.

Main concern

Public shaming, illegible notes, and inconsistent professionalism turn many students off.

What students said

“ and final were worth 70% of your grade but she practically gave them out for free.”
MATH2
“ . Lecture notes are outdated and illegible... Publically humiliates her students. Rude. Stubborn.”
ENG30
“The material is not difficult so if you can commit to self teaching you'll do fine. However, she is unbearable.”
ENGR30

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel self-taught with , and uneven support.

Main concern

, and poor communication make online riskier.

What students said

“It's completely self taught. and has us do multiple ungraded assignments each week.”
MATH10
“ . Online stats takers, beware, there is a surprise second final not listed on the syllabus.”
MATH10ONLINE
“ queen. She tries to get you to succeed. You still have to do the work though”
MATH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

tests to standard closed-style assessments tied to worksheets.

Worksheet-based finalsExtra creditInfinite retakes sometimesPop quizzesParticipation-linked

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in some math sections, yet still high-stakes.

Collaborative midtermOnline final with retakesBoard examTest heavy
“ and let you collaborate with students on it... She made her final online 5 questions, with ”
MATH2
“Without her lectures cannot pass the course Midterm and she goes through in the class”
ENG30

Online

some finals split unexpectedly, others are worksheet-based with little studying if videos are watched.

Surprise second finalWorksheet finalsSelf-taught prep
“She also split the IN THE SYLLABUS. One portion of the ”
MATH10
“ . Little studying. Overall good. Passable with an A”
MATH10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The material is not difficult so if you can commit to self teaching you'll do fine. However, she is unbearable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and , and organization issues. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“unprofessional and rude! ... math concepts not explained thoroughly, just a really bad teacher especially if math doesn't come naturally to you.”

🎁 Edge

72/100

“ queen. She tries to get you to succeed. You still have to do the work though”

⚠️ Classroom Tone

30/100

“Publically humiliates her students. Rude. Stubborn.”

👍

48/100

“She will go out of her way to make you succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just solves the problems without explaining it.
  • Lectures are very
  • Loved her engineering stories.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pretty easy class. Got an A without too much effort
  • Not hard to get an A
  • and final were worth 70% of your grade but she practically gave them out for free.

Theme 3

📁 About Organization

  • Terrible organization. The
  • notes are completely illegible

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

680

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent mixed reviews across online and in-person math and engineering courses give a consistent polarizing pattern.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5378
4 out of 555
3 out of 536
2 out of 565
1 out of 5146

Course coverage

MATH1012 reviews
ENG309 reviews
ENGR307 reviews
105 reviews
MATH24 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH10ONLINE3 reviews
MATH3B3 reviews
MATH2 reviews
STATISTICS2 reviews
3A1 review
CALC3B1 review
ENGR201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

30

A 29 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 3