AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kenn Huber

MATH3B · MATH4A · MATH24 · MATH2 · MATH26 · MATH10 · MATH3A · 121 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
58.88%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

calc if ; avoid his online sections and be cautious with Calc 2.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFast LecturerTest HeavyHilariousConceptual ExamsChill Personality
  • In-person students split between loving his chill humor and
  • Online MATH10 reviews slam zero instruction and a 60% final on Pearson
  • An A is doable if you master concepts and if you want a free ride

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are common if and truly understand concepts, but exams are conceptual and not .

Online MATH10 reviews report failing after a ; in-person As come with serious study.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content is conceptual and fast-paced, especially linear algebra and calculus sequences.

Both formats call the material hard; online adds self-teaching burden.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

, though graded worksheets or weekly quizzes reward showing up.

Most evidence is in-person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Strong students who like pace and ; others, especially after rough Calc 2 or .

In-person is mixed-positive; online reviews are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Partial credit and occasional curves help, but and .

Format shift

because instruction is missing.

Workload

Light

58/100

and classes short, but success still requires heavy outside study.

Format shift

Online workload shifts entirely onto Pearson and self-study.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

, and thorough; others find him rushed, distant, or useless online.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades lean on quizzes, midterms, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Fast, funny lectures with , and ; strong students thrive while weaker ones feel lost.

Main concern

and practice sets.

What students said

“He is very chill and funny. The course is hard because the actual material is hard, not because the professor is bad”
MATH26
“ AND PRACTICE TEST”
MATH26
“If you put in effort, you're gonna get an A. I took linear and calc3 with ”
MATH4A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are described as , and a heavily weighted final that tanks grades.

Main concern

No real lectures or support while the .

What students said

“No real teaching at ALL. , examples, or videos. Everything was dumped onto Pearson”
MATH10
“I would rather break every bone in my body ”
MATH10
“Spending time self-learning the material and class”
MATH3B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams emphasize conceptual application and new problem styles rather than drill copies of homework.

Conceptual ExamsPractice TestsPartial CreditTest HeavyConfusing T/F

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and partial credit; not clearly open-book.

Conceptual QuestionsPractice ExamsPartial CreditTrue/False Heavy
“The exam problems will be new problems, not familiar exercises, and ”
MATH26
“the but CONFUSING, and the true/false/stsf questions are the ”
MATH26

Online

Online comments focus on a ; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

High-Stakes FinalSelf-Taught Prep
“Final is 60% of the grade, which is unfair with zero instruction”
MATH10
“I Had a B and the and I failed”
MATH10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is very chill and funny. The course is hard because the actual material is hard, not because the professor is bad. Make sure to do all the HWs in time and you'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and online vs in-person gaps. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“great lecturer, well paced lectures. class is lecture + graded worksheet(totally doable and mostly based on participation)”

⚡

42/100

“ AND PRACTICE TEST”

💻 Online Red Flag

15/100

“No real teaching at ALL. , examples, or videos. Everything was dumped onto Pearson”

😂 Personality Win

80/100

“THE GOAT!!!! Lectures are easy to follow, somewhat fast paced, and followed by some problems”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Fast lectures, but in and out quick
  • Jim Carrey vibes, fast lecturer
  • He doesn't hand hold but he's very thorough and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you put in effort, you're gonna get an A
  • A is doable but tough
  • Test averages were around 73

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • , but most are pretty basic
  • study the practice tests

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

121

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across multiple courses and years with polarized but , and format differences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 524
3 out of 511
2 out of 58
1 out of 528

Course coverage

MATH4A14 reviews
MATH2613 reviews
MATH3B8 reviews
MATH3A7 reviews
MATH24 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH102 reviews
MATH242 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 2 · A 20 · A- 2

B range

10

B+ 1 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

4

D 4

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1