AI Rate Professor

Writing

Emily Liu

LIT30 · WR1 · LIT1 · WR2H · WR1WR2 · WR1H · WR2 · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
89.83%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want to actually improve as a writer and will put in steady effort; skip if you only want a free A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives excellent feedbackCaring mentorResearch-paper scaffoldNot an easy AAccessible office hours
  • and mentorship across WR and LIT courses
  • and process assignments, especially honors WR2H
  • High As are common if and stay on pace

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

As are common when , but she is often described as a .

Online and ; online adds flexibility on due dates.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Reading and multi-stage research papers make the intellectual load standard-to-challenging, not busywork.

In-person honors WR2H feels harder; online still requires substantial writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as optional while others stress participation and not missing class.

as not mandatory; in-person more mixed with participation tags.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Nearly every detailed review calls her among the and care.

Strong recommendation holds for both online and in-person formats.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Clear rubrics and , but several students call her a .

Format shift

Online students more often call her fair/lenient with deadlines; .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and multi-essay research projects, especially in WR2H.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy writing; 8-week and honors amplify the load.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students praise energy, mentorship, clear organization, and .

Format shift

Online and in-person both rate teaching highly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and a scaffolded final research paper more than traditional exams.

Format shift

One review mentions an in-class final essay in WR1; overall still assignment-driven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person writing and lit classes emphasize one , and a caring classroom energy.

Main concern

Honors and summer sections can feel heavy with papers and .

What students said

“Don't mistake her class to be an easy A; there is a lot of work to do each week, but not without reason.”
WR2H
“the whole class and it feels chill at the beginning until you get railed halfway through”
WR2H
“If she can make a Mechanical Engineering student excited to write a 7 page essay, Professor Liu can do anything.”
WR1H

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online WR2/WR2H still feels organized with , and flexible deadlines; as in person.

Main concern

Still a substantial writing load; lagging on process work hurts the .

What students said

“Amazing professor! I wasn't sure how an online writing class would go, but and easy.”
WR2
“Taking prof. Liu's WR2H course was the . VERY engaging lectures as she gives a lot of EC.”
WR2H
“ and is understanding and fair with due dates.”
WR2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly multi-stage essays and process work rather than strict timed exams.

Scaffolded research essaysRough-draft feedback path to ADiscussions often completion-basedFew traditional proctored exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person ; rare mention of an in-class essay final.

Multi-paper research projectDetailed essay feedbackOffice hours criticalOccasional in-class final essay
“When selecting a topic for it, as you will be composing three lengthy papers on this subject”
WR2H
“There are about 4-5 essays throughout the semester and the .”
WR1

Online

Online WR2/WR2H uses essays, discussions, and ; no clear proctoring claims.

Essay-based gradingClear rubricsExtra credit opportunitiesFlexible due dates
“4 essays. revise it and add all the essays together.”
WR2H
“She's a and puts in a lot of time to make sure everyone's .”
WR2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't mistake her class to be an easy A; there is a lot of work to do each week, but not without reason. Meet with her for office hours and ask for help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (14 online, 36 in-person), highlighting feedback, workload, and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Absolutely amazing, was never a good writer in high school and chose to challenge myself with her course and I'm so happy I did.”

📝

95/100

“She gives great, personalized feedback, which when followed, guarantees a good grade!”

⚖️ Effort vs Grade

62/100

“if you want the grade you're hoping for, it is crucial to invest your effort and time in your work.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“ . She is the kindest and most hard working professor I have ever had.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing energy, the entire class is one research project and so helpful
  • and really teaches you how to dig deeper in your writing
  • Her energy is irresistible and makes you want to pay attention and learn

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Don't mistake her class to be an easy A
  • and
  • If you listen to all of the to get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Prof. Liu is truly the kindest soul out there
  • She always looks out for her students' well-being
  • She has the kindest heart and truly wants us to succeed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across online and in-person over many years with consistent themes of and real workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 58
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

WR220 reviews
WR2H17 reviews
WR16 reviews
LIT304 reviews
LIT11 review
Show 2 more courses
WR1H1 review
WR1WR21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

38

A+ 5 · A 29 · A- 4

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1