AI Rate Professor

Languages

Keith Gamache Jr.

SIGN116 · ASLD101 · ASL15 · SIGN21 · SIGN24 · SIGN23 · ASL22 · 61690SIGN21 · SIGN22 · SIGN1 · ASL21 · 53 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will attend, practice, and stay fully in sign—most students call him a must-take.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious Immersion TeacherDeaf ASL InstructorParticipation HeavyCaring MentorManageable Work
  • Full ASL immersion with a Deaf professor makes class engaging and forces real language use.
  • Show up, practice weekly, and and an A is very common.
  • Online sections get more busywork and uneven .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many As reported , and participate; grades often reward consistent effort.

In-person As are common with attendance; online GE if weekly work is done.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, though immersion pace can feel fast at first.

Online Deaf Culture can feel reading and test heavy; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

In-person and and participation; skip class and you fall behind.

Some online async sections are more flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Strong majority praise humor, care, and real ASL learning and .

In-person enthusiasm is highest; online has more mixed workload and testing complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and rounding up appear often; a .

Format shift

; and curves draw complaints.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and videos are steady but usually described as quick and doable.

Format shift

Online sections more often say lots of busywork; in-person load is moderate.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Hilarious, caring immersion teaching with and stories.

Format shift

In-person teaching praised most; online organization is the main weak spot.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and finals.

Format shift

Online Deaf Culture leans more test and reading heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and highly recommended; and no-voice policy matter.

Main concern

Falling behind if you zone out because class runs entirely in ASL.

What students said

“KJ is an AMAZING teacher. Don't listen to the bad reviews. He genuinely cares for his students”
ASL21
“Amazing!! Absolutely hilarious professor which makes his class so fun.”
ASL15
“If you want to . Gamache”
SIGN22

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ASL and Deaf Culture and busywork; organization and video quality draw mixed notes.

Main concern

, and occasional weak online structure.

What students said

“Keith was such a great teacher. There are due dates for the assignments, but occasionally I missed them, and ”
ASL15
“the unrelated to the contents which he teaches”
SIGN23
“There is way too much work required in this class.”
SIGN21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and signing assessments are standard difficulty and align with practiced vocabulary for most students.

Signing VideosMidterms and FinalsWeekly QuizzesParticipation Labs

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and midterms are usually called straightforward if you practice signs and attend.

Straightforward ExamsSigning AssessmentsPop Quizzes Occasionally
“his exams and ”
ASL15
“All of the signs youll learn are on the ”
SIGN22

Online

Online reviews mention midterms covering many weeks, weekly quizzes, and video quality issues on source material.

Heavy MidtermsWeekly QuizzesRetakes Sometimes Allowed
“The questions were so hard that the average score of the class AFTER THE CURVE IS 70%.”
61690SIGN21
“weekly quizzes and , and final”
ASL15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“KJ is an AMAZING teacher. Don't listen to the bad reviews. He genuinely cares for his students and helps you if you fall behind. , and respectful. TAKE THIS PROFESSOR”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (13 online, 37 in person), highlighting immersion teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

😄 Fun Immersion Teaching

88/100

“KJ is hysterical, but make sure you show up to class and pay attention.”

👍 Strong Recommendation

88/100

“You will thank me if !! He is amazing!”

📗 Manageable Path to A

82/100

“Do the homework and online quizzes and you'll for sure get an A.”

💻 Online Workload Caveat

45/100

“There is way too much work required in this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Absolutely hilarious professor which makes his class so fun
  • He's deaf, so the combination barrier is a little difficult sometimes. But I absolutely love him!
  • Immersion so it can be a little intimidating at first but this method has been the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I had a 89.88 and he rounded it up to an A
  • Easy A for me since I have studied ASL previously
  • Decent amount of HW, but very manageable and very easy for a 4 unit class

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • KJ is the nicest professor I've ever had
  • He really cares about his students
  • , and engaging

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

53

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years consistently praise immersion teaching, with predictable online-versus-in-person differences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 510
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

SIGN2213 reviews
SIGN2111 reviews
ASL218 reviews
SIGN235 reviews
ASL154 reviews
Show 6 more courses
61690SIGN212 reviews
ASL222 reviews
SIGN1162 reviews
ASLD1011 review
SIGN11 review
SIGN241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

33

A+ 6 · A 21 · A- 6

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4