AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anton Butenko

MATH8 · MATH124 · MATH3 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a supportive math professor and will keep up with ; not ideal if you need a tight, no-tangent lecture pace.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and flexibleHeavy homeworkSarcastic humorCan fall behind paceSupportive if you try
  • Many students call him caring, funny, and flexible with
  • Math 3/Calc is still hard with lots of homework and sometimes rushed or
  • A few strongly negative reviews cite confusion, shame-based classroom tone, and last-minute materials

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Support and flexible homework help, but calc content, heavy assignments, and .

; the one online review still frames learning as demanding.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Calc and trig are called inherently difficult with lots of homework and test pressure.

In-person Math 3 drives this assessment; online sample is too small to change it.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; participation and quizzes can still matter.

Mixed in-person reports; online expects camera-on presence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Majority would take him again for care and and pacing complaints.

In-person opinions are mixed-positive; the single online review is positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Flexible homework deadlines and support help grades, but and some call him a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated complaints of lots of , and stacking practice problems.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears across in-person Math 3 and Math 8 reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and willingness to help; others say lectures go off track and force self-teaching.

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed but lean positive overall.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, and quizzes carry major grade weight.

Format shift

and frequent quizzes; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews split between praise for care, flexibility, and , tough tests, and disorganization.

Main concern

, and difficult cumulative finals.

What students said

“I have never seen anyone put this much effort into their class. !”
MATH3
“ !! You're basically taking an online class if you sign up for this class.”
MATH3
“You can submit all homework on the last day of class and still get an A.”
MATH3

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single online review praises skilled teaching and real learning, while noting cameras-on expectations.

Main concern

Camera-on participation and demanding class engagement.

What students said

“Great Professor, and I actually learned alot by his teaching technics”
MATH3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often hard and ; resources and flexibility help but .

Difficult testsCumulative finalQuizzes oftenHomework heavyDate changes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes last-minute or moved exam dates; quizzes can appear regularly.

Hard midtermsCumulative finalQuizzesMoved exam dates
“ and covers very obscure topics he barely covers.”
MATH3
“He and our final within 3 days”
MATH3

Online

Only one online review; it does not clearly document proctoring or .

Camera expected
“keep your cam on or he will call on you”
MATH3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the only professor who wants you to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 math reviews, mostly in-person Math 3, balancing support versus workload and pacing concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor Butenko cares a lot about his students. If you fall behind and .”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“He gives a ridiculous amount of homework, so many assignments with 50 questions each.”

👍

68/100

“Overall, one of .”

⚠️ Pacing Risk

40/100

“he often goes on tangents and the class falls very far behind, which later in the semester makes the class feels rushed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • funny and communicative aswell
  • He can be very sarcastic, but hilariously so
  • and provides detailed videos

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and can stack up really fast
  • By no means this was an easy class and I had to work really hard

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • always caring and kind
  • Willing to negotiate and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 14 reviews with one online; recent Math 3 feedback is detailed but opinions are mixed.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH310 reviews
MATH1242 reviews
MATH82 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1