AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Donna King

HD131 · HD4 · PSYC7 · HD145 · HD110 · HD7 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

A and related majors who will show up, participate, and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring MentorGroup Panels Over TestsInspirationalParticipation HeavyStudy Guides Provided
  • Warm, knowledgeable child-development instructor who builds a safe, discussion-based classroom.
  • As are common with , and panel-style finals.
  • Attendance and participation matter a lot; missing class can tank you even if content is fair.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and group or panel finals make As very achievable with consistent effort.

Online and in person both report easy As when students complete projects and study guides.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

; intensive or project-heavy terms still need steady work.

; standard terms and many online sections feel lighter.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly stressed; missing days can mean failing or being dropped.

Both formats emphasize presence; a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

who inspired major changes.

In person has the strongest love letters; online is still mostly glowing with one harsh outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Accepts late work with small deductions, allows resubmits with feedback, and grades effort fairly.

Format shift

Online comments highlight resubmits; in .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, but readings, group projects, and .

Format shift

Some ; intensive in-person sections report heavier loads.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly , and inspiring lectures.

Format shift

Both formats; older HD110 complaints about disorganization are minority and older.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Mix of projects, essays, discussions, occasional quizzes, and panel or group finals.

Format shift

In person leans panel and group oral assessment; online uses projects, labs, and written finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

or group assessments, and strong mentoring energy.

Main concern

and occasional heavy projects or reading.

What students said

“I absolutely loved her class and she is super sweet and understanding as long as you communicate with her!!”
HD7
“ as a discussion panel not as a group form.”
HD145
“Attendance is VERY important as if pass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
HD131

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Mostly strong online experiences with , and doable projects; one sharp outlier found the class confusing.

Main concern

A minority report locked assignments and .

What students said

“Just put in the work and you can easily get an A.”
PSYC7
“Her study guides will help with the exams.”
HD7
“A lot work but no learning. Shell want you to participate in discussion but cut you off rudely.”
PSYC7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments favor group panels, guided study, and .

Discussion Panel FinalsGroup TestsStudy GuidesResubmit Feedback

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person often uses verbal panel finals and .

Verbal Panel FinalGroup Oral QuestionsPop Quizzes OccasionalParticipation
“ as a discussion panel not as a group form.”
HD145
“ as small groups and you usually only had to answer 2-3 questions out of 20ish possible questions”
HD7

Online

Online assessments include projects, occasional labs, study-guide-supported exams, and .

Study GuidesProjectsResubmitsDiscussion Work
“allows you and resubmit”
PSYC7
“Her study guides will help with the exams.”
HD7

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have never experienced a better professor in my entire life - and I have taken a LOT of classes!”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting care, attendance rules, and panel-style assessment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is the most understanding and reliable professor I have had thus far.”

💚 Care & Mentorship

92/100

“she inspired me to change my major to child development.”

📋

20/100

“Attendance is VERY important as if pass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

👍

90/100

“If !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she always gives us a very safe environment
  • Her lectures are interesting and not too heavy
  • She is scattered - all over the place during lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class is super easy
  • Just put in the work and you can easily get an A
  • The class is super insightful

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • super sweet and understanding
  • easily one of the
  • She cares about her class and what she's teaching

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

28 reviews with strong consistency on care, participation, and student-friendly assessments across formats.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HD711 reviews
PSYC78 reviews
HD1103 reviews
HD1453 reviews
HD1312 reviews
Show 1 more courses
hd41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 3 · A 15 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1