AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Julia Leslie

COMM1 · COS126 · COMM5 · COMM2 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will do the work and ; be cautious about fully online sections due to grading lag.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringResubmit AllowedLots of WorkClear FeedbackPublic Speaking Support
  • Most students find her caring and resubmits.
  • Workload can feel high for a COMM class, especially speeches, outlines, and outside research.
  • Online sections draw complaints about slow or and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

As are common if you complete work and resubmit, but speeches and outlines can be graded roughly without effort.

In-person students emphasize resubmits leading to As; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Material is not conceptually brutal, but , and speech prep create a solid workload.

Both formats mention lots of work; online adds reading-heavy COMM5 complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory or say you should be there to learn how to do the work.

One in-person COMM2 review said optional but recommended; online mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and skill-building, with a minority warning about work volume or online neglect.

In-person recommendations are clearly stronger than recent online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Can grade speeches and major work roughly, but resubmission culture and help for struggling students soften the sting.

Format shift

; online grading speed is the bigger fairness issue.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and printing even when content is doable.

Format shift

Both formats report lots of work; short 8-week sections feel especially packed.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Caring, direct, and ; makes speaking class comfortable for many.

Format shift

In-person excellence contrasts with online non-responsiveness complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and resubmittable assignments drive the .

Format shift

Exit speech or test-out mentioned, but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and making public speaking comfortable, with a real but manageable work load.

Main concern

and some tough speech grading.

What students said

“What I like about her is that she wants you to fix and resubmit your work for a better grade.”
COMM2
“She is by far the . The class is a lot of fun if you participate”
COMM1
“She is honestly no help... Also never posts on Canvas so you'll without a .”
COMM1

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one strong caring COMM1 review, two and .

Main concern

Delayed or missing grades undermine resubmit culture and leave students stuck.

What students said

“This professor has been especially nonexistent. if not just never”
COMM2
“I did not receive any of my grades from my assignments for almost 2 months.”
COMM5
“She is willing to meet outside of class and work with you in order to see you succeed. She is so sweet & caring”
COMM1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on speeches and outlines with practice and resubmits rather than locked-down exams.

Speech BasedResubmit WorkExit SpeechNo Strict Proctoring Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person COMM work is speech and and optional resubmits.

Speech OutlinesResubmitsParticipationHelpful Feedback
“ and were easy to do... you can resubmit things for a better grade.”
COMM2
“Just do all the assignments and she will help you with ”
COMM1

Online

Online reviews focus on assignment ; no clear proctoring details.

Assignment HeavySlow GradingSpeech Practice
“Be sure you know what she wants with each speech early on in the semester so you have plenty of time to practice for the exit speech.”
COMM1
“At the beginning of the semester, I got really good grades. But after that time, I did not receive any of my grades”
COMM5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“What I like about her is that she wants you to fix and resubmit your work for a better grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, balancing strong in-person care themes with workload and . Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student Care

74/100

“ as she helped many students who were struggling in the class get back up!”

📝 Workload Warning

35/100

“She gives a ridiculous amount of work for what a joke of a class it is.”

🔄 Resubmit Culture

64/100

“Just put a little effort into those and you'll be fine, and you can resubmit things for a better grade.”

💻 Online Responsiveness Risk

40/100

“This professor has been especially nonexistent. if not just never”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the class very comfortable, especially for a public speaking class
  • It was very direct and open with the students
  • She is a great teacher who will listen to you.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The workload was very light even for a big procrastinator like myself
  • you will get graded pretty roughly
  • Theres lots of work involved but its not hard.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she truly cares about the students
  • She is so sweet & caring
  • She is honestly no help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews with consistent in-person themes but fewer recent online samples and some older conflicting views.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMM19 reviews
COMM23 reviews
COMM51 review
COS1261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3