AI Rate Professor

Geography

Jodi Titus

GEOGRAPHY1 · GEOG3H · GEOG1 · GEOG10H · GEOG · GEO3 · GEO1H · GEOG38 · GEO101 · GEO2 · GEO1 · 196 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
17.09%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid Jodi Titus if you have any other geography option; if and accept unpredictable, high-stakes exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderTest HeavyLate GradingBoring LecturesUnresponsive
  • Most students call her one of the worst options for intro geography with .
  • , and picky, with frequent complaints about no grade tracking.
  • A few honors or async sections felt easier with completion-style work, but that is the minority experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Many students still land B range grades, but and mismatched test content make a clean A feel expensive and uncertain.

and ; a few in-person honors comments report easier completion-based grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Intro geography is treated like a and exams students call extremely hard.

Both formats report hard tests; workload and unclear modules.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most in-person reviews mark attendance mandatory and treat class presence as part of the grade, while .

Evidence for ; many online reviews say attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

With roughly one in and repeated run-away language, students overwhelmingly recommend anyone else.

Both online and ; the few strong recommends cluster in specific honors or easy async cases.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and exams that feel disconnected from taught material.

Format shift

Online accuracy grading and late returns feel especially punitive; a minority of .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Weekly readings, discussions, papers, and of the term.

Format shift

Online students stress long readings and weekly essays; .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students describe dry lectures, weak support, and little transparency, with rare positive outliers in select sections.

Format shift

Negatives dominate both formats; online adds .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams and a few major graded items drive the grade far more than day-to-day learning activities.

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy; and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and exams pulled from material never covered.

Main concern

textbook plus a cold, unhelpful classroom tone.

What students said

“Lectures . ”
GEO1
“ youve never seen”
GEO1
“She grades off COMPLETION, not quality. and lectures.”
GEO1H

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel disorganized, with late posts, useless , and very slow grade returns.

Main concern

, and tests or activities that feel disconnected from posted material.

What students said

“This professor is horrible she gives you a study guide that's completely useless!”
GEO1
“Lazy. Texbook is super long and readings take over 4 hours.”
GEO3
“Save your money and time books never used, class is still waiting for ”
GEO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently described as hard, picky, and poorly aligned with lectures, so .

Test HeavyLecture-Exam MismatchOpen Book (some online)Accuracy Graded Work

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and full of material never covered in class or the book.

In-Person Hard ExamsLecture-Exam MismatchTest Heavy
“The exams are so hard and everyone in the class struggles a lot on them.”
GEO1
“ or the textbook”
GEO1

Online

Online comments mention open-book midterms or finals in some sections, but also useless study guides and .

Open BookUseless Study GuidesAccuracy Graded Homework
“There was a and a ”
GEO1
“This professor is horrible she gives you a study guide that's completely useless!”
GEO1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and in-person geography sections, with , and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Terrible teacher cannot stress enough how bad of a teacher ”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ unless it is your last option.”

📝

30/100

“Lectures . ”

🐢

20/100

“literally the grade until months later”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Incredibly boring hour-and-a-half lectures with
  • Does not care about you
  • Jodi's lectures were dry and unhelpful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The exams are so hard and everyone in the class struggles a lot on them
  • literally don't know what i could've done to earn an A in this class

Theme 3

⏱️ About Support and Feedback

  • Super unresponsive, and you are unable to track your grade throughout the course
  • Don't even bother asking for help;
  • No transparency at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

196

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent detailed reviews across online and in-person sections show highly , and grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 527
3 out of 527
2 out of 530
1 out of 589

Course coverage

GEO127 reviews
GEOG16 reviews
GEO1H4 reviews
GEO34 reviews
GEOG3H3 reviews
Show 6 more courses
GEO1011 review
GEO21 review
GEOG1 review
GEOG10H1 review
GEOG381 review
GEOGRAPHY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 3 · A 14 · A- 3

B range

16

B+ 6 · B 10

C range

1

C- 1

D range

3

D 3

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2