AI Rate Professor

History

Mark Okuhata

ETHN10 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
41.18%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you write strong discussion posts and ; otherwise pick another ethnic studies section.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing graderDiscussion heavyTough subjective gradingCaring for somePop quizzes
  • and students who call grading unfair.
  • Many say discussion posts and .
  • Attendance and participation matter a lot in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A minority get easy As and open-book work, but and hard-to-earn high marks.

Online reviews lean harder; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Content itself is intro ethnic studies, but , and misaligned study guides raise real difficulty.

Both formats report long lectures and demanding written work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance and participation frequently drive grades, with strict lateness and index-card rules in person.

; online still requires weekly engagement.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Take-again rate is low and .

Recent in-person praise exists, but many peers still urge avoiding him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

26/100

and claims of objective inaccuracy on discussion posts dominate.

Format shift

; a few in-person students disagree.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly discussions, quizzes, and reading are steady; not always overwhelming but higher than a GE freebie.

Format shift

Online can mean 2-6 hours of and quiz each week.

Teaching experience

Average

44/100

Passionate caring lectures for fans, but others find rants, ego, and .

Format shift

In-person is more polarized; online leans more negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and an essay final outweigh traditional multi-exam weight for many sections.

Format shift

and ; others stress pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Some call him chill with open-book quizzes and easy A for attendance; many report tough pop quizzes, fragile ego, and failed classmates.

Main concern

, and microscope grading of discussions.

What students said

“His class is an Easy A if you attend and ”
ETHN10
“This class has failed the majority of its students.”
ETHN10
“just spare yourself the pain and .”
ETHN10

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Weekly lecture, discussion, and quiz rhythm; , and frustrating.

Main concern

Subjective discussion and .

What students said

“It was more difficult than my OCHEM due and .”
ETHN10
“ and poorly grades anything that has a subjective interpretation.”
ETHN10
“Good guy. He will help you if you're having trouble and you can tell he really cares about his topics and students.”
ETHN10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

vague pop quizzes and subjective discussions.

Open book quizzesUnproctored midterm in some termsPop quizzesDiscussion postsFinal essay

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and dropped quizzes; others use harsh pop quizzes and strict attendance.

Open book midtermDropped quizzesPop quizzesAttendance heavy
“25% from the and unproctored), and 25% from the !”
ETHN10
“Expect 1-2 vague pop quizzes weekly; even if you read, you can still get a zero and .”
ETHN10

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly quizzes and details.

Weekly quizzesDiscussion postsSubjective grading
“You have a lecture, a discussion, and a ; lectures can be 2-6 hours per week.”
ETHN10
“ and poorly grades anything that has a subjective interpretation.”
ETHN10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 ETHN10 reviews capturing polarized grading and care themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

26/100

“His grading system is misleadingly designed to encourage students to fail.”

❤️ Caring Counterpoint

70/100

“You can tell this professor really cares about his students and is passionate about what he teaches.”

📉 Recommendation Split

36/100

“If you're looking to take an intro .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very entertaining, realistic, and great to sit through.
  • Quizes are about 90% lectures and they are 3 hours long of just ranting.
  • Nicest professor ever!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class has failed the majority of its students.
  • Honestly, I think this was one of the easiest classes I've ever taken AND IT WAS SO DARN FUN!
  • just put in a little effort and ur chillin.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Policy Friction

  • He takes a .
  • arrive a minute early but miss the index card and you're late.
  • Midterm and LONG study guide he creates.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen recent detailed reviews show clear polarization with enough sample and specificity for medium-high confidence.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ETHN1017 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1