AI Rate Professor

Art History

Gail DeAngelis

ARTH1 · ARTH25 · PHOTO1 · 61570A · PHOT1 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
84.62%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

class if you can handle steady weekly writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy GraderWeekly Writing LoadOpen Book FriendlyCaring ProfessorBoring Lectures Sometimes
  • Students almost always earn As if they keep up with , and short essays.
  • options and little proctoring pressure.
  • Lectures can feel dull, but and late work is often accepted.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Doing weekly work reliably yields As; she even awards and accepts late work.

Online Easy A language is strongest; in-person also reports lenient As for attendance and effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is approachable art history or photography history, with dull but straightforward lecture-based learning.

Both formats describe easy material with more work volume than conceptual difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Online has little seat-time pressure, while and as expected.

Online is freer; as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students would take her again for fairness, kindness, and an .

Online and answer.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Students report full credit for , and late work for almost full credit.

Format shift

Online late-work and unproctored exam comments reinforce leniency; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly essays, discussion posts, and lecture summaries add up even though each task is simple.

Format shift

Online workload comments are more frequent; .

Teaching experience

Good

81/100

, and organized, though multiple students call the lectures boring.

Format shift

; online praises structure and kindness more than lecture energy.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Weekly writing and exams and a .

Format shift

Both formats combine weekly assignments with non-cumulative exams and a paper.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and lenient, with easy assignments and .

Main concern

Lectures can get boring toward the end of the term.

What students said

“she is an easy .”
ARTH25
“ and homework. If you show up and actually listen you will get an A.”
PHOTO1
“DeAngelis is absolutely wonderful inspired my passion for photography again.”
PHOT1

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are easy As with , and papers; and exams unproctored.

Main concern

Steady weekly writing can pile up even though individual tasks are simple.

What students said

“when it came time for book.”
PHOTO1
“ (but they aren't proctored ;) ).”
ARTH25
“youd have to try to get below an A but you still learn a ton about art history.”
ARTH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and , and study guides closely match the tests.

Open Book QuizzesUnproctored ExamsStudy Guide Matches TestNon Cumulative Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; no strict proctoring tools are mentioned.

Lecture Based TestsMultiple Choice ExamsNon Cumulative
“there were two (non cumulative!) exams and a 5pg paper”
ARTH25
“ .”
PHOTO1

Online

and exams are described as unproctored; study guides make tests predictable.

Open Book QuizzesUnproctored ExamsStudy Guide Is Basically The Test
“she let some of them be open book.”
PHOTO1
“ (but they aren't proctored ;) ).”
ARTH25
“ ”
ARTH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“youd have to try to get below an A but you still learn a ton about art history.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting easy grading, weekly writing load, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯

86/100

“she gave me 100% even though it was terrible.”

📝 Weekly Workload

48/100

“honestly pretty easy but a lot of work”

🧪

82/100

“ (but they aren't proctored ;) ).”

❤️ Caring Presence

81/100

“Prof. DeAngelis is super sweet, one of the ”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was super easy
  • as long as you do everything you'll get an A
  • and homework

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures got sooooo boring
  • The lectures are boring but
  • extremely passionate about the subject
  • caring professor

Theme 3

📚 About Assignments

  • 3-4 paragraph writing assignment, discussion post, and lecture notes are due every week
  • a LOT of work
  • don't buy the book - you don't need it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen mostly detailed reviews from 2017-2025 are consistent, but the .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTH255 reviews
ARTH13 reviews
PHOTO13 reviews
61570A1 review
PHOT11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 5

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values