AI Rate Professor

English

Kurt Meyer

WR1 · W1 · LIT65065 · LIT1 · WR399 · EXP389 · LIT33 · WRI1 · WR1H · WR301 · WR1ANDLIT1 · WR201 · ENG · LIT43 · 146 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
75.56%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Strong pick for writing or lit if you want mentorship and ; expect slow grades and lots of in-class talking.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring writing mentorEssay-focused gradingFlexible deadlinesDetailed feedbackTalkative lectures
  • Grade centers on a handful of , and generous support.
  • Most students call him kind, inspirational, and willing to extend deadlines.
  • Recurring complaints , and a few recent tough or AI-related experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

and rewrites, and grades are widely described as .

Both formats emphasize essay rewrites; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is approachable for writing classes, with manageable readings and .

Evidence is mainly in-person; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

, though participation and conferences still help.

In-person reports ; online is mixed but often flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Long-run take-again sentiment is strong because he .

; a cluster of newer in-person reviews is harsher.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and extensions; a minority say tough or unsatisfied.

Format shift

Leniency is strong historically; .

Workload

Light

66/100

Usually a , though some semesters feel paper-heavy.

Format shift

Online has occasional stacking-homework complaints; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

and conferences, with friction about slow returns and rambling talk.

Format shift

In-person has the deepest praise; online is smaller but mostly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Essays and ; exams are rare or minor.

Format shift

True across online and in-person writing and lit sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person writing and lit classes emphasize , and a warm mentor vibe.

Main concern

, and occasional favoritism or AI-accusation complaints surface in newer reviews.

What students said

“If u study hard and communicate more, EASY A. I like this professor.”
WR1
“He is an , and the .”
WR1
“He genuinely cares about all his students and will go out of his way to make sure you succeed.”
WR1

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, though a couple students disliked piled homework or long lectures.

Main concern

A few online students felt workload stacked or .

What students said

“Prof. and flexible. The , and he's generous with deadlines.”
WR1
“Just go to most of the meetings and do all 4 of the essays, and you should pass the class.”
W1
“It feels and moving back due dates”
WR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and second chances rather than strict proctored tests.

Essay-based assessmentRevisions and resubmitsIndividual conferencesFew or no high-stakes exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a big final project, with conferences clarifying expectations.

4-7 essays typicalConferences for feedbackOpen-ended projectsRare formal exams
“Only the and he is very chill with deadlines.”
WR1
“His classes are mostly discussions/lectures, with a .”
LIT33

Online

deadlines and redo chances; exams are not the main risk.

Essays only or mainlyFlexible deadlinesRedo for better grade
“The , and .”
WR1
“ .”
WR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nicest WR professor ever, He is so genuine and understanding of all student... Incredible professor 100% recommended!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (5 online, 45 in-person), highlighting mentorship, essays, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“He is the most gentle, attentive, and .”

📝 Easy A Path

78/100

“For as long as you submit the and show that you are working... you'll get 100% in his class.”

🐢

55/100

“He's an extremely slow grader and ”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does talk quite a bit, and he is animated
  • and flexible.
  • he talks too much and after you get out from his class, .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EASY A. I like this professor.
  • and supports you through the whole process.
  • As long as you put Forth effort there's no reason why you can't get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He genuinely cares about all his students
  • He's so inspirational and caring.
  • hes a great teacher. really cares about his students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

146

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years and mostly in-person sections show stable praise for care and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 598
4 out of 524
3 out of 57
2 out of 53
1 out of 515

Course coverage

WR120 reviews
WR39912 reviews
LIT433 reviews
W13 reviews
ENG2 reviews
Show 9 more courses
LIT12 reviews
EXP3891 review
LIT331 review
LIT650651 review
WR1ANDLIT11 review
WR1H1 review
WR2011 review
WR3011 review
WRI11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 5 · A 16 · A- 2

B range

13

B+ 5 · B 6 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2