AI Rate Professor

Health Sciences PE & Athletics

Simon Davies

NUT1ONLINE · NUT1 · NUT2 · SPORTSPSYCH · 134 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
13.85%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if you have any alternative; online Nutrition with Davies is widely called a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTeach YourselfUnresponsive EmailsObscure Quiz QuestionsHarsh Point Nipicking5pm Deadlines
  • Most students say there are almost no real lectures and .
  • Weekly quizzes test obscure details not on slides, with tight timers and .
  • , and assignment instructions often confuse entire classes.
  • A small minority of and praise his energy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A's happen mainly for grinders who master the book and do all ; most call quizzes and .

Online is harsher and ; a effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

Intro nutrition is treated like an advanced course with weekly hard quizzes and .

Both formats are hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Many sections grade attendance or lateness, and .

; online still polices deadlines and response rules tightly.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

and the dominant student message is run or .

Online avoidance is nearly universal; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report points lost for tiny formatting issues, wrong , and .

Format shift

Harsh grading appears in both formats; online .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and discussions create constant pressure even when unit count is low.

Format shift

Online weekly quizzes dominate; in person .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

, and dismissive or missing responses.

Format shift

Online teaching quality is near rock bottom; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grade leans on frequent timed quizzes and under-weighted.

Format shift

Both formats are quiz and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person NUT is slightly less uniformly hated: a few praise humor and , but , and mandatory attendance.

Main concern

and communication stays weak.

What students said

“Bad. Lecture is dense and and needed to know on the exam.”
NUT1
“He is such an tho because online it's not so easy”
NUT1
“Might be the . This guy doesn't know how to teach, his tests are nothing like what he teaches.”
NUT1
“Insightful, entertaining and inspirational.”
NUT1

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, hard weekly quizzes from random textbook lines, poor instructions, and .

Main concern

You teach yourself while and the instructor rarely clarifies.

What students said

“ . He should not be a professor. He is not thre for students but for his paycheck.”
NUT1
“ and not even based on the book.”
NUT1
“In this class, you teach yourself 100%.”
NUT1ONLINE
“there are . .”
NUT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and book lines, and poorly aligned with slides or study guides.

Timed Weekly QuizzesObscure Textbook DetailsTests Unlike LecturesSingle AttemptTiny Point Values

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

lectures or study guides, with frequent tests and picky scoring.

Tests Unlike LecturesFrequent ExamsHarsh Point DeductionsAttendance Graded
“ . Midterm avg 67% final avg 75%.”
NUT1
“The midterms and .”
NUT1
“ ”
NUT1

Online

Online students describe , weekly impossible quizzes with less time than questions, and that feel wrong.

No LecturesObscure Quiz ItemsTight TimersSelf-Taught
“ book and provides less time for the test than there are questions.”
NUT2
“It's like he closes his eyes, picks a random sentence in the chapter and expects you to know it for the test”
NUT1
“ ”
NUT1ONLINE

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . He should not be a professor. He is not thre for students but for his paycheck.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (30 online, 20 in and unresponsiveness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“This professor does not care about students and he does not provide any lectures.”

🚫

16/100

“RUN.”

📧 Unresponsive

15/100

“This professor will not respond to your emails or phone calls.”

📝 Quiz Pain

20/100

“You could take notes on all 30+ pages of each chapter for the tests and still struggle because of the way the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • In this class, you teach yourself 100%

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and not even based on the book
  • if you put in the work and effort, you will get an A most likely

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • or he just sends ok
  • He also never replies to emails, but
  • For the instructions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

134

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews heavily skewed negative over many years with repeated unresponsive and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 510
3 out of 517
2 out of 526
1 out of 564

Course coverage

NUT128 reviews
NUT1ONLINE13 reviews
NUT27 reviews
SportsPsych2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 8

B range

7

B 6 · B- 1

C range

11

C+ 4 · C 5 · C- 2

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1