AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Andrew Wu

ETHN10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Online may be an easy A for self-directed students, but the .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy online ALight weekly workPolarized reviewsGroup projectsParticipation-focused
  • Online ETHN10 students call it an easy A with light weekly discussions and group work.
  • One in-person review alleges unequal engagement with disabled students and strongly advises avoiding him.
  • Small sample and conflicting experiences make outcomes highly format-dependent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Online students say an A is nearly automatic with weekly work, while the .

Easy-A claims come from online reviews; .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Content is described as interesting and light, with about 45 minutes of weekly online work when completed on time.

Course easiness evidence is almost entirely from online ETHN10 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while the as mandatory.

In-person marks attendance mandatory; online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Online reviewers recommend him as chill and easy, but the .

Online reviews are positive; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

82/100

Online comments say bad grades are hard unless you slack; .

Format shift

Generosity claims are from online sections only.

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

Online workload is framed as short weekly discussions and group tasks taking under an hour.

Format shift

Light-load detail is online-only; .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Online students call him kind and interesting, but the in-person complaint about dismissiveness sharply lowers the blended experience.

Format shift

Teaching reputation splits hard between positive online and negative in-person evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Online course uses weekly discussions and group work plus quizzes and .

Format shift

Assessment detail is documented in online reviews; in-person review emphasizes participation and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person review reports feeling dismissed and unequal participation treatment for disabled students.

Main concern

Serious equity and classroom climate concerns from the only in-person review.

What students said

“I felt he was dismissive of my contributions in the class and !!”
ETHN10

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online ETHN10 is described as light, chill, and hard to fail if and group work.

Main concern

, and weekly group work even if overall load is light.

What students said

“Easy A if you complete the discussions and group work each week. It's impossible to get a bad grade unless you're slacking off big time.”
ETHN10
“Took about 45 minutes completing a week's workload. Easy and kind teacher with interesting and eye opening content.”
ETHN10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online assessments include quizzes and two exams plus a ; .

4 quizzes2 examsChoice final paper optionsWeekly discussions

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and focuses on participation climate instead.

Participation mattersGroup projects
“I observed that nondisabled students were called on more frequently than those with disabilities”
ETHN10

Online

Online ETHN10 includes four quizzes, two exams, and a .

4 quizzes2 examsWritten interview optionCompare and contrast essay
“4 quizzes, 2 exams. from: a written interview on a person of color, or a compare and contrast essay on two ethnic groups.”
ETHN10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you complete the discussions and group work each week. It's impossible to get a bad grade unless you're slacking off big time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in-person), highlighting format split and credibility limits. Credibility rating: Low.

🟢 Online Easy Path

78/100

“Took about 45 minutes completing a week's workload. Easy and kind teacher with interesting and eye opening content.”

⚠️

20/100

“ !!”

👍 Split Recommendation

42/100

“Easy A if you complete the discussions and group work each week.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • Easy A if you complete the discussions and group work each week
  • One discussion post, 2 replies to classmates, and an
  • interesting and eye opening content

Theme 2

🏫

  • I felt he was dismissive of my contributions in the class
  • nondisabled students were called on more frequently than those with disabilities

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's impossible to get a bad grade unless you're slacking off big time
  • 4 quizzes, 2 exams

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews total, with a and limited detail, so confidence is low.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ETHN103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1