AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Phoebe Chung

MATH124 · MATH253 · MTH60405 · MATH351 · MATH105 · MATH2 · MATH11 · STATC1000 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you will , and can teach yourself when lectures feel unclear.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkExtra credit heavyCheat sheets allowedTough graderMandatory attendance
  • She is often described as nice and , and lots of .
  • Homework load is heavy and support tools.
  • Lecture clarity is polarizing; several students say English or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Cheat sheets, , and similar study guides help, but tough grading and .

; the single online review paints A-getting as riskier under strict proctoring.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Lower math and stats can be manageable with notes, but many call the path hard when lectures do not land.

Evidence is almost all in person; online felt harder than necessary to one student.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most and or grade boosts tied to showing up.

; online attendance detail is sparse.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

About half would take again; fans love her support while unless .

Recent in-person MATH11/STAT fans are warmer; older and online voices are harsher.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Tough-grader tags and though and attendance boosts exist.

Format shift

In person can still pass with EC; online review emphasizes harsh docks and voided tests.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Kind and willing to help, but clarity is inconsistent and some find lectures .

Format shift

; online sample is negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Exams weigh heavily but , and make up a large share too.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

recent lower-level classes praise cheat sheets and step-by-step help, while and .

Main concern

and if you need crystal-clear lectures.

What students said

“Professor Chung is the . If you pay attention and ask questions in class you can easily pass with an "A".”
MATH11
“She allows you to have a so use those wisely.”
STATC1000
“This was the .”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online review reports extremely strict webcam proctoring and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“if any part of your head, hands, or your camera she will screen shot you and kick you out and ”
MATH124

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person, cheat sheets and ; online proctoring is strict.

Cheat sheets allowedPractice exams similar to testsExtra credit on examsStrict webcam proctoring online

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mirror study guides or .

Cheat sheet each examPractice examsStudy-guide similarityExtra credit
“She allows you to have a so use those wisely.”
STATC1000
“ .”
MATH124
“ do in class and the homework.”
MATH11

Online

One online review describes full-camera proctoring with screenshots and of frame.

Webcam proctoringStrict camera rulesHarsh assignment nitpicking
“if any part of your head, hands, or your camera she will screen shot you and kick you out and ”
MATH124

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Chung is the . If you pay attention and ask questions in class you can easily pass with an "A". do in class and the homework.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 , and polarized clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝 Workload Load

28/100

“She gives a lotttt of homework and you will need a lot of time for it.”

🧾

70/100

“Cheat sheets allowed for two questions on each topic”

😕 Clarity Split

40/100

“her english is pretty broken so ”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“If you think you can pass, then (enter at your own risk).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's kind but she
  • , and guide student step by step
  • the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She allows you to have a
  • shes a good person but the amount of .
  • do in class and the homework

Theme 3

⏰

  • if you go to class everyday, at the end of the semester she gives you a 1% boost
  • Do the homework and you will pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews with , but strong polarization and only one online review lower confidence on format splits.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1247 reviews
MATH113 reviews
MATH23 reviews
MATH2533 reviews
MATH1052 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH3511 review
MTH604051 review
STATC10001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3