AI Rate Professor

Writing

Daniel Strasberger

WR2 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Strong pick for WR2 if and growth, especially if sports topics do not bother you.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear FeedbackCaringSports-Themed WritingEngagingClear Expectations
  • and useful essay feedback
  • Course often sports-themed for research papers; great if you like sports, limiting if you do not
  • Workload is moderate with readings, logs, essays, and group activities

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Most students earn A or A+ with steady writing work; it is not free but effort is rewarded.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings range about 1-4; content is manageable with regular reading and essays.

All five reviews are in person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

.

Evidence is in person only; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

; four give glowing 5s and one still recommends despite sports focus.

All recommendations come from in-person WR2 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Clear rubrics and ; grades land mostly in the A range without .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reading logs, group work, and a semester research paper; amount of work is described as just right or good but not light.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and a welcoming classroom.

Format shift

One lower rating is about sports theme, not teaching skill.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and a long research paper.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Engaging in-person writing class with , and a major research paper often tied to sports and community themes.

Main concern

Heavy sports focus in themes and lectures may not suit students who dislike sports.

What students said

“ and chill, and ... He gives specific feedback on what you did well and what you need to work on”
WR2
“his class was so sports focused. ... Only take his class if you like sports.”
WR2
“Amazing professor. Engaging and passionate teacher that creates a fun learning environment.”
WR2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe essays and a term research paper rather than proctored exams; .

Essay FocusedResearch PaperReading LogsNo Formal Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment is essay- and project-based with reading logs; reviews do not clearly prove traditional proctored exams.

Research PaperEssay FocusedReading Logs
“Worked all semester on a and connect to an issue we personally care about.”
WR2
“There is a reading and log for each lecture, and the amount of work is just right.”
WR2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and chill, and ... which really helped me grow as a writer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting feedback, care, and sports-theme fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Great and engaging professor. Created a welcoming environment and was always there to support us in our learning and growth.”

📝

90/100

“ and what you need to work on, which really helped me grow as a writer.”

🏈 Sports Theme Risk

40/100

“ if you like sports.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very caring and chill
  • Always engaged with the class
  • Engaging and passionate teacher

Theme 2

📝 About Writing Growth

  • I learned a lot from it

Theme 3

🏈 About Course Theme

  • so sports focused

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews from 2024-2026 with high consistency, but no online sample and a modest total count.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WR25 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values