AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rebecca Van Guilder

MATH10 · MATH2 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if you can; students describe a punishing, low-support math experience with poor teaching payoff.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderReads PowerPointLightning-Fast LecturesTest HeavyHarsh Attendance
  • Students widely report PowerPoint reading, rushed lectures, and little real teaching.
  • , and many F or .
  • Recent and drop risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Many F and and trick-test comments show an A is extremely hard to earn.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Students rate difficulty very high with lightning-speed lectures and and tests.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Recent reviews say attendance is strictly required with and .

Older reviews sometimes said optional, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and repeated run-away warnings across years.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

, and many failing grades dominate.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and pop quizzes keep the load high.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say she mainly reads slides, rushes examples, berates intelligence, and teaches little.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments emphasize tests, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MATH10 reviews paint a harsh picture of , and .

Main concern

, and lectures that do not teach the material.

What students said

“I strictly PROHIBIT taking this professor even if absolutely necessary for your STEM career.”
MATH10
“She zooms and moves on instantly.”
MATH10
“Each time you are late/ .”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as heavy, tricky, and harshly graded with little lecture support.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesTrick QuestionsTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sneaky trick questions on exams.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesTrick Questions
“As for the trick questions just to mess around with your mind.”
MATH10
“ but she grades them difficultly.”
MATH10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I strictly PROHIBIT taking this professor even if absolutely necessary for your STEM career.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews spanning , and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She zooms and moves on instantly.”

📉 Grades & Difficulty

12/100

“On a difficulty scale of 1-10, it's a 50.”

⏰

12/100

“ if you miss more than 6 class days.”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“I strictly PROHIBIT taking this professor even if absolutely necessary for your STEM career.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches straight from the and .
  • Lectures are lightning speed and sporadic to the content.
  • YouTube was my professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The .
  • She sneaks in a ton of irrelevant trick questions.
  • Her class was like survival of the fitness... who can out last each other from dropping out.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She will constantly berate your intelligence.
  • Can't leave for an emergency w/o getting yelled at.
  • This professor is incredibly arrogant.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews spanning 2016-2026 with , and difficulty support high credibility.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH108 reviews
MATH21 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1