AI Rate Professor

Economics

Joshua Mitton

ECON1 · ECON1H · ECON2 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
60.71%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Prefer him in person if and a friendly grade path; treat online sections as high-risk for chaos and silence.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLate GraderEasy A In PersonFunny LecturesDisorganized OnlineCaring but Busy
  • , and an easy A if you show up and follow lectures.
  • Online and recent terms draw harsh criticism for , and end-of-semester grade dumps.
  • Content difficulty is moderate-to-low, but organization and responsiveness are the real risk.
  • ],
  • suitableStudentType
  • Effort For Reward

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students report , and A grades if they keep up, especially in person.

Online is still often an easy grade if you finish the work, but chaos and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Material is generally approachable with lecture focus and .

In-person lectures make concepts easier; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

74/100

Most reviews mark attendance optional or low-stakes, though .

A ; online is effectively asynchronous.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Older and ; recent online and some honors reviews warn transfer students away.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students repeatedly say he grades nicely, rounds up, and .

Format shift

Leniency shows in both formats; online pain is lateness more than harshness.

Workload

Light

76/100

, and lecture-centered assessment keep the load manageable for most.

Format shift

Online workload is light but poorly timed; in person is light if you attend.

Teaching experience

Good

60/100

Engaging, funny in-person teaching is a , and weak online presence.

Format shift

Teaching quality reads much higher in person than online.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Grades often rest on a small set of , and a .

Format shift

Online uses reading quizzes and vague exams; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews , and straightforward grading, though recent honors sections also report severe grade delays and disorganization.

Main concern

and uneven structure can still hurt transfer .

What students said

“Highly respectable professor. You can really tell that he cares about his students”
ECON1H
“He's nice and approachable... he's very lenient”
ECON1
“didn't grade one thing all semester long”
ECON1H

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students frequently report little interaction, assignments posted late, vague exams, and itself is easy.

Main concern

and grades that appear only at the end.

What students said

“he has yet to grade an ”
ECON1
“ ! Class instruction was very vague”
ECON2
“ ”
ECON1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but online tests can feel disconnected from assigned reading.

Lecture-based examsFew quizzesVague online questionsOpenStax aligned unevenly

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessments track lectures and notes more closely, with limited quizzes and a .

Lecture-based finalFew quizzesGrade by few things
“Everything covered in on the ”
ECON1H
“Grade is based off a and a final”
ECON1

Online

Online exams and or off-book questions, with little instructor guidance.

Vague exam alignmentReading quizzesEnd-of-semester grading
“ learning”
ECON2
“some questions have nothing to do with the textbook material”
ECON2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly he somehow makes his material interesting... .”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, contrasting strong in-person rapport with recurring online and . Credibility rating: High.

⏳

25/100

“ ”

😄

82/100

“This man is a blessing sent from heaven if it wasnt for this man I would not like economics”

🅰️ Easy A Potential

78/100

“Pretty easy A...I took this class for the credit and it was an easy A”

📧 Weak Online Support

30/100

“Dude takes about 3 months (2 weeks if ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are amazing and not boring
  • He is funny, laid back, and overall a chill professor
  • makes every lesson fun

Theme 2

⚠️ About Organization

  • and frustrating
  • didn't grade one thing all semester long
  • No due dates. Every thing due at the end of semester

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Easy A and actually learn lots of stuffs
  • he tends to do that if you ask
  • He even told us he gets complaints that he grades too nicely

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three reviews from 2015-2026 cover both formats with consistent praise for leniency and repeated criticism of .

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ECON118 reviews
ECON210 reviews
ECON1H5 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 6 · A 13 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4