AI Rate Professor

Physics

Enrico De Flaviis

PHYS4D · PHYS4B · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

limited reliable feedback and curve.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderNo generous curvePolarizing reviewsTest heavySparse feedback
  • Only five recent Physics reviews, and several are unserious or meme-like
  • Serious comments split between helpful and caring versus cold and
  • and high difficulty make grades feel punishing when averages are low

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

, and unless you already master the material.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Physics content is rated difficult with , and reading-heavy tags.

Difficulty comments come only from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory in some reviews and not in others, with .

, and they conflict.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Take-again rate is about 40% and comments range from helped a if you have to.

Mixed in-person only; some jokes reduce clarity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students report , and no curve even when class averages are very low.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is not heavily detailed, but lecture-heavy and .

Format shift

Sparse in-person comments only.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Positive notes on help and humor clash with strong claims he is cold and unsupportive.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person and low volume.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests, few graded items, and .

Format shift

In-person Phys courses only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Phys-4B and Phys4D reviews are thin and mixed, ranging from helped a ton to horrible and .

Main concern

and reports that he does not care about students.

What students said

“Horrible professor, doesn't care about his students”
Phys-4B
“I was so sad when I found out he didn't curve my grade up to a C. The class average was a 0/4.”
Phys-4B
“helped a ton!”
Phys-4B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and limited graded items drive the grade, with .

Test heavyTough graderPop quizzesNo curveGraded by few things

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and few graded components, with reports of .

Test heavyPop quizzesNo curveGraded by few things
“I was so sad when I found out he didn't curve my grade up to a C. The class average was a 0/4.”
Phys-4B
“Beware of pop quizzes”
Phys4D
“ ”
Phys-4B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible professor, doesn't care about his students, shrivels up whenever I talk to him. if you ahve to.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews with low detail consistency. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“helped a ton!”

👎 Recommendation Rate

40/100

“ if you ahve to.”

⚖️

20/100

“I was so sad when I found out he didn't curve my grade up to a C. The class average was a 0/4.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • helped a ton!
  • Horrible professor, doesn't care about his students
  • mad respect for eating cheetos with a fork

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class average was a 0/4.
  • things
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews with mixed seriousness, short bodies, and conflicting tone make conclusions weak.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Phys-4B4 reviews
Phys4D1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1