AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Raissa Lee

HD150 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless HD150 is required and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDelayed GradingMid-Semester ProctoringRule ChangesGroup Project HeavyInconsistent Policies
  • Nearly all recent reviews warn against taking her HD150 course.
  • , so students cannot track standing.
  • Open-book policies were switched mid-semester to Proctorio monitoring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some still report A or A+, but , and chaos make the path stressful and unclear.

Almost all evidence is online; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content difficulty is mixed, but daily rule changes and .

Online reviews dominate; one outlier calls it easy if you participate.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and not in others, with office-hour dependence for rule updates.

Online reports both mandatory and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly every unless forced, citing inconsistency and stress.

Online and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students call grading unreasonable, delayed, and based on shifting expectations.

Format shift

Online majority drives this judgment; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Group projects, tests, and frequent module changes create a heavy, stressful load.

Format shift

Online tags repeatedly list lots of , and test heavy.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe boring lectures, passive-aggressive tone, and little genuine support.

Format shift

Nine of ten reviews are online and almost uniformly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Midterms, proctored quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online students emphasize midterm hardness and proctoring; and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and projects for months plus unexpected proctoring.

Main concern

and surprise proctoring make progress impossible to track.

What students said

“None of the finals and 6 projects have been graded since 9/3/24, and now it's Jan.”
HD150

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online HD150 is widely described as chaotic with late grades, shifting rules, heavy groups, and mid-semester proctoring.

Main concern

Policy flips to Proctorio and months of ungraded work create high stress.

What students said

“ALSO SWITECH FROM OPEN BOOK TO PROCTORIO MID SEMESTER”
HD150
“Nothing has been graded in the past 2 months.”
HD150
“ if you have no other option.”
HD150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews report a mid-semester switch from open-book to Proctorio with tight timing and high stress.

Proctorio Added Mid-SemesterOpen Book Switched to ProctoredTimed Essay QuestionsHeavy Midterm

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review says proctoring was introduced unexpectedly mid-semester despite the class not being proctored originally.

Unexpected ProctoringUngraded Finals
“she unexpectedly introduced proctoring midway through the semester, even though this was not originally a proctored class”
HD150

Online

Online HD150 switched from open-book to Proctorio mid-semester with short per-question timers.

ProctorioOpen Book to Proctored2 Mins Per QuestionMidterm Heavy
“she added and only giving us 2 mins per question on proctorio”
HD150
“The switch from open-book to Proctorio monitoring contradicted the syllabus”
HD150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Was initially well-structured, the course suffered from mid-semester policy changes. The switch from open-book to Proctorio monitoring contradicted the syllabus & created inconsistency between assessment methods.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 mostly online HD150 reviews with highly consistent complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ ! Lots of groups.”

⏳

15/100

“I can't rate anything about grades because I have not received a grade since the 4th week of the semester.”

🔒 Proctoring Shock

20/100

“ALSO SWITECH FROM OPEN BOOK TO PROCTORIO MID SEMESTER”

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“All she cares about is showing off herself. Lectures are boring; .”

Theme 1

📋

  • Changes Module rules and expectations daily
  • Nothing has been graded in the past 2 months

Theme 2

🧪

  • only giving us 2 mins per question on proctorio

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Assumes everyone is a cheater
  • Come off as passive aggressive and rude
  • unless you have to

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 10 recent, detailed reviews show strong consistency on chaos and , but the sample is small.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

HD15010 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4