AI Rate Professor

Art History

Patricia Drew

ARTH27 · ARTH4 · ARTH26 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you can self-pace online work and ; do not expect strong support if something goes wrong.

Best fit · Self Taught ProClear grading criteriaSlow email responseEasy when you submit on timeTough on some online studentsPolarized communication
  • many report easy A if work is submitted on time, others report zero leniency and dropped.
  • Online feedback and response .
  • with reading-heavy, image-memorization tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Multiple students call it an easy A with timely submissions, though a and drops.

Easy-A claims are strongest in online ARTH4; but thinner sample.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is usually light survey work, though and self-taught.

Online comments swing from one hour a week to overloaded modules; and image memorization.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

as mandatory in some sections and optional in others with no consistent policy.

Online and across terms.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

and praise is canceled out by communication failures and hostile interactions.

A few online and ; most online negatives drive the low score.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

and grading easy, but tough-grader and no-leniency .

Format shift

Online is polarized between free A and no leniency; in-person leans fairly easy.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Some terms are light monthly writing; , and a term paper.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are louder; the recent in-person survey felt lighter.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Clear criteria and , but , and harsh student interactions drag quality down.

Format shift

Online communication is the main complaint; in-person adds snappy participation demands.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Grades lean on module questions, journals, papers, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online ARTH4 is assignment-heavy; , and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

criteria, but lectures may be thin and personality can feel snappy.

Main concern

Participation pressure and weak .

What students said

“the class was easy she assigned 10 8-10 sentence questions, a quiz, and a and .”
ARTH27
“She's very snappy and demands class participation or else will lash out to students.”
ARTH26

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ARTH4 is often easy busywork with open-notes prep, but several students , and almost no communication.

Main concern

Inconsistent workload and unresponsive, sometimes confrontational online communication.

What students said

“Prof Drew is 100% an easy A. and working a full time job while taking her class.”
ARTH4
“she was not understanding at all. has no respect for students. when confronted with ".”
ARTH4
“she is the 4 days to respond.”
ARTH4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often open-notes and assignment-aligned online, while .

Open notes examsModule questions prep examsImage memorization testsFew or no final in some sections

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and memorizing images, with lectures called unhelpful for that prep.

Image memorization testsNo final in some survey sections
“For and basically memorize them. ...”
ARTH26
“a quiz, and a and .”
ARTH27

Online

Students say module questions prepare open-notes exams and the class can be finished with modest weekly time.

Open notesAssignment-aligned exams
“The module questions were enough for preparing for , and I'd say I spent an hour or a little more per week on this class!”
ARTH4

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't listen to the few negative reviews, because you should be able to tell the difference between a bad student and a bad prof.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews across online and in-person Art History sections, highlighting polarized ease versus support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She doesnt really communicate with you at all lol so annoying”

👍 Recommendation Rate

36/100

“ . has no respect for students.”

🅰️ Easy A Potential

76/100

“Prof Drew is 100% an easy A.”

📧 Response Time

28/100

“she is the 4 days to respond.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and if you do miss something.
  • Just reading and watching the videos she links.
  • ...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is easy as long as you complete and turn in .
  • Way too much work for a 3 unit class.
  • She is a .

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • she is the 4 days to respond.
  • when confronted with ".
  • She doesnt really communicate with you at all lol so annoying

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews from 2019-2024 give usable detail but opinions are highly polarized and online-heavy.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ARTH46 reviews
ARTH261 review
ARTH271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1