AI Rate Professor

English

Megan Friess

WR1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

grades may be fine, but the lone review does not endorse a strong classroom experience.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAverage professorLots of homeworkGet ready to readClear grading criteriaMandatory attendance
  • Only one review exists, so evidence is very thin.
  • The student earned an A but rated quality only 2 of 5 and called the professor average.
  • , and mandatory attendance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

The only reported grade is an A, but lots of homework and A.

Evidence comes only from one in-person WR1 review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty rated 3 with reading and unusually easy or brutal.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but quality is only 2 and the comment is merely average.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

An A with generosity.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Tags flag lots of homework and heavy reading for WR1.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Quality 2 of 5 and the one-word comment Average professor point to a weak teaching impression.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

and a writing course suggest assignment weight over exams; exams are not described.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single in-person WR1 review labels the professor average despite an A grade and .

Main concern

Quality rated low with homework and and almost no explanatory comment.

What students said

“Average professor”
WR1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam format or proctoring for this professor.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

“Average professor”
WR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Average professor”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the thin average-quality signal. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Average professor”

📚 Workload Signal

30/100

“Lots of homework”

👍

55/100

“Yes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Overall Impression

  • Average professor
  • Get ready to read

Theme 2

📈 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • Get ready to read

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one sparse review from 2024 limits reliability despite clear tags and grade data.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WR11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values