AI Rate Professor

Writing

Grace Li

WR1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if possible; students report , and weak classroom delivery.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor FeedbackSlow LecturesMandatory AttendanceLots of HomeworkConfusing Expectations
  • Both available reviews rate teaching quality at 1 with
  • as poor and
  • Slow slide reading and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Reported grades are C+ and B with no easy-A language and .

Online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content difficulty is moderate, but filler work and it should.

; in-person stresses delivery problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Both reviews indicate mandatory attendance with little learning payoff.

Online and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Two 1-star reviews with and strongly negative teaching and .

Both formats are negative for different reasons.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report and discovering .

Format shift

; in-person focuses more on class delivery.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework and filler assignments plus required essay meetings .

Format shift

Online explicitly mentions lots of filler work.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

, and little useful instruction.

Format shift

; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on essays, meetings, participation, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing work over exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, slow slide reading and little real student interaction.

Main concern

Painfully slow lectures that rarely finish promised material.

What students said

“speaks at a painfully slow pace, most classes dont cover everything they were promised to.”
WR1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online WR1 started okay then fell apart with slow grading, filler work, and .

Main concern

and not knowing what is missing until the .

What students said

“Professor Li doesn't know what is being asked, gives poor feedback, you never know what's missing until you see the .”
WR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment pain centers on essays and .

Essay FocusedUnclear FeedbackFiller Work

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; complaints focus on mandatory slow slide lectures.

Mandatory AttendanceSlide Reading
“Requires attendance for every single class and just reads the the entire class.”
WR1

Online

Online evidence centers on essays and meetings with .

Essay MeetingsPoor FeedbackFiller Work
“ but it was useless.”
WR1
“ see the final grade”
WR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Li doesn't know what is being asked, gives poor feedback, you never know what's missing until you see the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 highly consistent negative reviews across online and in-person WR1. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

12/100

“just reads the the entire class”

📝

20/100

“ see the final grade”

🚫 Avoid

8/100

“As time progressed, everything fell apart.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • speaks at a painfully slow pace
  • just reads the
  • barely acknowledges the students when she asks them questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • gave lots of filler work
  • you never know what's missing until you see the
  • essay meetings... it was useless

Theme 3

⏱️ and Pace

  • most classes dont cover everything they were promised to

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two detailed but recent reviews exist, both strongly negative, so but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

WR12 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values