AI Rate Professor

Writing

Dominick DiGiacomo

WR2 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him only if you write solid essays and ; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay-heavy gradingIn-class group projectsClear feedbackMandatory attendanceManageable readings
  • Grade rests .
  • In-class ; and readings.
  • Two strong fans and one strong critic create a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Strong writers can land an A with solid essays and feedback, but weak writers find the .

All evidence is from in-person WR2 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is approachable writing work with light daily group tasks, though annotated bibliographies add real work.

All evidence is from in-person WR2 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Every review reports attendance as mandatory with participation and in-class workshops counting.

All evidence is from in-person WR2 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Two students strongly recommend him for kindness and feedback; .

All evidence is from in-person WR2 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Described as fair with and clear criteria, .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

No quizzes and light in-class slides, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and , though one found the class design frustrating.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grade is almost entirely essay-based with in-class group projects and little or no quiz weight.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person WR2 centers on four major essays plus daily in-class group slides; and .

Main concern

If writing is weak, the .

What students said

“Definitely the best professor to take WR2. Not only the easiest professor by a long shot but also a .”
WR2
“All your grade is based on 4 essays so and !”
WR2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe few or no traditional exams; grades come mainly from major essays and in-class work.

Essay-based assessmentNo quizzes mentionedIn-class group projects

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No traditional exams emphasized; four essays and .

Four essaysAnnotated bibliographyIn-class group workshops
“ . It's just 10 points for your presence in class and all group workshops in class.”
WR2
“The and doing the assigned readings, so the workload is pretty manageable.”
WR2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely the best professor to take WR2. Not only the easiest professor by a long shot but also a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person WR2 reviews spanning late 2023 to early 2024. Credibility rating: Low.

✍️

58/100

“All your grade is based on 4 essays so and !”

👍

72/100

“He gives you plenty of time to work on your essays and , and is also a .”

📌 Light Daily Classwork

55/100

“All other assignments are in-class group projects that are just a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very friendly and helpful professor!
  • , and is also a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you're not particularly good at writing it'll be brutal
  • All your grade is based on 4 essays
  • The and doing the assigned readings

Theme 3

👥 About Class Format

  • daily
  • 10 points for your presence in class and all group workshops

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent WR2 reviews with mixed tone and limited course breadth lower confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WR23 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values