AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Janna Finn

MATH · MATH253 · MATH2MATH3A · MATH3B · MATH2 · 3A · MATH3A · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
52%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you already handle math well and ; avoid if you need a slow, hand-holding intro.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast-Paced MathPractice Exams Match TestsTough GraderTest HeavyClear When You Study
  • Calculus and precalc are fast and and little partial credit for some.
  • Students who grind practice and say As are achievable.
  • Weaker or rusty math students frequently drop and warn against her pace and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is doable if and weekly quizzes, but she is widely called a tough grader with little .

Nearly all grade evidence is in person; the online review does not support easy As.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Precalc and calculus move fast with test-heavy structure, so content and pace challenge average students.

In-person calculus comments dominate; online also rates high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many reviews say skip class and you will not pass, and .

; online review marks attendance mandatory too.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Prepared hard workers strongly recommend her; students wanting easy A or .

In-person recommendations are mixed-to-positive among workers; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and test-heavy tags dominate, with limited partial credit and little reported.

Format shift

In-person and online both lean strict; .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and practice-test study create a steady heavy load.

Format shift

In-person workload details are abundant; .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and energetic when students keep up; others say she is too fast and impatient.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is common among successful students; the single online review is poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Weekly quizzes, multiple midterms, and .

Format shift

; online also tags test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews split between gifted-lecturer praise with and , and drops.

Main concern

Fast pace and and underprepared students.

What students said

“ so kindly provides.”
MATH2
“Her tests and and she won't give partial credit.”
MATH3A
“ , so do them, review with her in class & you'll get an A.”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online MATH3B review is strongly negative , and .

Main concern

Teaching quality online is reported as poor with shortened class time.

What students said

“This is a self taught class as she did not teach any of the material herself.”
MATH3B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are frequent and strict, often aligned to practice exams, with limited partial credit for small mistakes.

Practice Exams Match TestsWeekly QuizzesLittle Partial CreditNo Extra Credit Often

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses use weekly quizzes and and practice tests.

Practice ExamsWeekly QuizzesMultiple MidtermsStrict Partial Credit
“ , so do them, review with her in class & you'll get an A.”
MATH2
“one little mistake and she won't give partial credit.”
MATH3A
“5 super hard exams. Very challenging”
MATH2

Online

Online review tags test-heavy and but .

Test HeavyTough Grader
“ ”
MATH3B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , so do them, review with her in class & you'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting pace, exams, and polarized success. Credibility rating: High.

⚡ Pace & Rigor

28/100

“She taught at a fast pace and could be impatient.”

📝

82/100

“ so kindly provides.”

⚖️

30/100

“shes a .”

🎯 Teaching Strength

78/100

“Shes honestly a really gifted lecturer.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and gives great lectures
  • she makes understanding math so easy
  • This is a self taught class as she did not teach any of the material herself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's hard to get A in this class because she is a .
  • If you do the !
  • 5 super hard exams. Very challenging

Theme 3

⚠️ About Survival Tips

  • Just do you work and there's no surprises
  • Avoid if you haven't taken math in awhile.
  • if you miss 6 hours of lectures

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-one reviews across many math courses and years , and tough testing.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH212 reviews
MATH3A12 reviews
3A2 reviews
MATH3B2 reviews
MATH1 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH2531 review
MATH2MATH3A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Rather not say 2