AI Rate Professor

Art

Jacqueline Gross

ART1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

; reviews describe hostile communication and unforgiving grading in ART1.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLots of homeworkGet ready to readGraded by few thingsConfusing directions
  • Both reviews rate quality 1 and .
  • In-person students describe , and .
  • Outcomes include Incomplete and F with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Reported outcomes are Incomplete and F under tough, nitpicky grading with no path described to an easy A.

Both online and and poor grade outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

18/100

High difficulty ratings plus confusing directions and .

Both formats describe high difficulty; in-person adds communication friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Both reviews report attendance as mandatory.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

No positive recommendations; and .

Both formats are negative; in-person is more extreme.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

and penalties for tiny formatting details define the .

Format shift

Online nitpicks file names; in-person demands exact preferred methods.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

; online stresses reading readiness.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students report , and easy annoyance.

Format shift

In-person details hostile classroom and email behavior; .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Homework and graded submissions dominate; .

Format shift

Limited detail in and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The so far, with confusing directions and angry responses to questions and email.

Main concern

Hostile reactions to questions and rigid exact-format expectations.

What students said

“ so far. Always goes on confusing tangents about directions that could've be easily explained in a minute or so.”
ART1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review cites nitpicky grading on small details like file names.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Often irked by small details missing, such as the name of the file.”
ART1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not detail proctoring tools but .

Tough graderGraded by few thingsLots of homework

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence focuses on rigid expectations and harsh .

Tough graderLots of homeworkGraded by few things
“Gets very angry when things aren't done EXACTLY the way she wants.”
ART1

Online

Online evidence only supports nitpicky grading .

Tough graderGet ready to read
“Often irked by small details missing, such as the name of the file.”
ART1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so far. Always goes on confusing tangents about directions that could've be easily explained in a minute or so.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in and communication themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Gets annoyed very easily if you ask her any sort of questions; will constantly interrupt/disregard you speaking.”

⚖️

10/100

“Often irked by small details missing, such as the name of the file.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ so far.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Gets annoyed very easily if you ask her any sort of questions
  • Will yell at you for emailing her

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Often irked by small details missing, such as the name of the file
  • Lots of
  • Gets very angry when things aren't done EXACTLY the way she wants

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews, both quality 1, with consistent negativity but very small sample and limited time diversity.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART12 reviews

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1